U.S. Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Houston South Area Office
17625 El Camino Real, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77058
Phone: (281)286 0583 FAX: (281)286 6352
DOL Seal


Citation and Notification of Penalty


To:
BP Products North America, Inc.
and its successors
2401 5th Avenue S
Texas City, TX 77590
Inspection Number: 311962674
Inspection Dates: 05/04/2009-10/29/2009
Issuance Date: 10/29/2009
Inspection Site:
2401 5th Avenue S
Texas City, TX 77590
The violations described in this Notification of Failure to Abate Alleged Violations are alleged to have occurred on or about the days the inspection was made unless otherwise indicated within the description given below.

This Citation and Notification of Penalty (this Citation) describes violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. The penalty(ies) listed herein is (are) based on these violations. You must abate the violations referred to in this Citation by the dates listed and pay the penalties proposed, unless within 15 working days (excluding weekends and Federal holidays) from your receipt of this Citation and Notification of Penalty you mail a notice of contest to the U.S. Department of Labor Area Office at the address shown above. Please refer to the enclosed booklet (OSHA 3000) which outlines your rights and responsibilities and which should be read in conjunction with this form. Issuance of this Citation does not constitute a finding that a violation of the Act has occurred unless there is a failure to contest as provided for in the Act or, if contested, unless this Citation is affirmed by the Review Commission or a court.

Posting - The law requires that a copy of this Citation and Notification of Penalty be posted immediately in a prominent place at or near the location of the violation(s) cited herein, or, if it is not practicable because of the nature of the employer's operations, where it will be readily observable by all affected employees. This Citation must remain posted until the violation(s) cited herein has (have) been abated, or for 3 working days (excluding weekends and Federal holidays), whichever is longer. The penalty dollar amounts need not be posted and may be marked out or covered up prior to posting.

Informal Conference - An informal conference is not required. However, if you wish to have such a conference you may request one with the Area Director during the 15 working day contest period. During such an informal conference you may present any evidence or views which you believe would support an adjustment to the citation(s) and/or penalty(ies).

If you are considering a request for an informal conference to discuss any issues related to this Citation and Notification of Penalty, you must take care to schedule it early enough to allow time to contest after the informal conference, should you decide to do so. Please keep in mind that a written letter of intent to contest must be submitted to the Area Director within 15 working days of your receipt of this Citation. The running of this contest period is not interrupted by an informal conference.

If you decide to request an informal conference, please complete, remove and post the page 4 Notice to Employees next to this Citation and Notification of Penalty as soon as the time, date, and place of the informal conference have been determined. Be sure to bring to the conference any and all supporting documentation of existing conditions as well as any abatement steps taken thus far. If conditions warrant, we can enter into an informal settlement agreement which amicably resolves this matter without litigation or contest.

Right to Contest - You have the right to contest this Citation and Notification of Penalty. You may contest all citation items or only individual items. You may also contest proposed penalties and/or abatement dates without contesting the underlying violations. Unless you inform the Area Director in writing that you intend to contest the citation(s) and/or proposed penalty(ies) within 15 working days after receipt, the citation(s) and the proposed penalty(ies) will become a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and may not be reviewed by any court or agency.

Penalty Payment - Penalties are due within 15 working days of receipt of this notification unless contested. (See the enclosed booklet and the additional information provided related to the Debt Collection Act of 1982.) Make your check or money order payable to "DOL-OSHA". Please indicate the Inspection Number on the remittance.

OSHA does not agree to any restrictions or conditions or endorsements put on any check or money order for less than the full amount due, and will cash the check or money order as if these restrictions, conditions, or endorsements do not exist.

Notification of Corrective Action - For violations which you do not contest, you should notify the U.S. Department of Labor Area Office promptly by letter that you have taken appropriate corrective action within the time frame set forth on this Citation. Please inform the Area Office in writing of the abatement steps you have taken and of their dates, together with adequate supporting documentation, e.g., drawings or photographs of corrected conditions, purchase/work orders related to abatement actions, air sampling results, etc.
(Please see attached "Corrective Action Verification")

Employer Discrimination Unlawful - The law prohibits discrimination by an employer against an employee for filing a complaint or for exercising any rights under this Act. An employee who believes that he/she has been discriminated against may file a complaint no later than 30 days after the discrimination occurred with the U.S. Department of Labor Area Office at the address shown above.

Employer Rights and Responsibilities - The enclosed booklet (OSHA 3000) outlines additional employer rights and responsibilities and should be read in conjunction with this notification.

Notice to Employees - The law gives an employee or his/her representative the opportunity to object to any abatement date set for a violation if he/she believes the date to be unreasonable. The contest must be mailed to the U.S. Department of Labor Area Office at the address shown above and postmarked within 15 working days (excluding weekends and Federal holidays) of the receipt by the employer of this Citation and Notification of Penalty.

Corrective Action Verification

Dear Sir or Madam:

OSHA's inspections are intended to result in the abatement/correction of violations of the OSHAct. To verify that this has been accomplished, Section 1903.19 requires that an employer certify to OSHA, within ten (10) days of the final abatement date that each item cited has been corrected.

This abatement certification letter must include the following:

Name of Employer

OSHA Inspection Number

Citation and Item Numbers to which the submission relates

The date each item was abated, specific action taken to abate each violation and appropriate documentation for the action taken. Where appropriate, this documentation should include photographs, work orders, purchase orders, personal protective equipment provided, standard operation procedures, copies of written programs, engineering controls, monitoring data, etc. Adequate supporting documentation may allow us to close the case file. The lack of adequate documentation could result in a follow-up inspection.

A statement that affected employees and their representatives have been informed of the abatement actions

A statement that the information submitted is accurate

The signature of the employer or the employer's authorized representative.

Following is a sample format that may be used for this submittal:

Name of Employer                  

Citation
Number
Item No.
Instance No.
Date Item
Abated
Corrective
Action Taken

Date this letter of submission posted                                    

I certify that the information submitted is correct.



___________________________________ Employer or Authorized Representative

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES OF INFORMAL CONFERENCE

An informal conference has been scheduled with OSHA to discuss the citation(s) issued on 10/29/2009. The conference will be held at the OSHA office located at Houston South Area Office, 17625 El Camino Real, Suite 400, Houston, TX, 77058 on _____________ at _____________. Employees and/or representatives of employees have a right to attend an informal conference.

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 1a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 98 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 1b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 98 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 2a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 11P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 2b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 11P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 3a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 12 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 3b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 12 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 4a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 163 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 4b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 163 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 5a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 167 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 5b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 167 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 6a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 6b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 7a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PB did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 7b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PB was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 8a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PC did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 8b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PC was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 9a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 176 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 9b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 176 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 10a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 193 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 10b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 193 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 11a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 194 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 11b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 194 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 12a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 12b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 13a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 236 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 13b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 236 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 14a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 244 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 14b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 244 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 15a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 245 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 15b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 245 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 16a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

a. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 16b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 17a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 247 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 17b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 247 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 18a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 250 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 18b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 250 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 19a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 251 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 19b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 251 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 20a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 256 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 20b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 256 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 21a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 27 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 21b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 27 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 22a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 276 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 22b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 276 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 23a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 290 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 23b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 290 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 24a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 291 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 24b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 291 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 25a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 293 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 25b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 293 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 26a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 294 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 26b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 294 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 27a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 27b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 28a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PC did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 28b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PC was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 29a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 30 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 29b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 30 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 30a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 31 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 30b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 31 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 31a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 311 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 31b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 311 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 32a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 314 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 32b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 314 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 33a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 318 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 33b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 318 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 34a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 319 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 34b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 319 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 35a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 410 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 35b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 410 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 36a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 411 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 36b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 411 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 37a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 415 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 37b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 415 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 38a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 43 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 38b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 43 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 39a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 44 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 39b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 44 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 40a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 4P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 40b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 4P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 41a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

a. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 53 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 41b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 53 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 42a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 54 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 42b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 54 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 43a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 55 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 43b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 55 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 44a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 79 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 44b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 79 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 45a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 89 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 45b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 89 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 46a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 205R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 46b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 205R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 47a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 206R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 47b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 206R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 48a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 207R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 48b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 207R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 49a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 49b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 50a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 210R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 50b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 210R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 51a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 218R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 51b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 218R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 52a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 221R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 52b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 221R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 53a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 222R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 53b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 222R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 54a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 236R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 54b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 236R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 55a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 241R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 55b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 241R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 56a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 56b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 57a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 259R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 57b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 259R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 58a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 260R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 58b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 260R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 59a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 336R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 59b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 336R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 60a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 337R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 60b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 337R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 61a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 406R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 61b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 406R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 62a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 408R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 62b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 408R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 63a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 431R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 63b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 431R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 64a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 432R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 64b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 432R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 65a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 433R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 65b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 433R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 66a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 595R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 66b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 595R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 67a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 596R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 67b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 596R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 68a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 597R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 68b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 597R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 69a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 598R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 69b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 598R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 70a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 608R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 70b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 608R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 71a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 609R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 71b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 609R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 72a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 625R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 72b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 625R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 73a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 639R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 73b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 639R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 74a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 640R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 74b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 640R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 75a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 697R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 75b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 697R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 76a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 700R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 76b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 700R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 77a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 706R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 77b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 706R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 78a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 806R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 78b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 806R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 79a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 807R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 79b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 807R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 80a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 809R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 80b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 809R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 81a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 814R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 81b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 814R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 82a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 815R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 82b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 815R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 83a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 816R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 83b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 816R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 84a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 817R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 84b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 817R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 85a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 831R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 85b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 831R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 86a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 832R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 86b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 832R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 87a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 837R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 87b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 837R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 88a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 843R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 88b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 843R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 89a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 866R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 89b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 866R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 90a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 867R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 90b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 867R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 91a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 869R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 91b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 869R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 92a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 902R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 92b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 902R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 93a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 903R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 93b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 903R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 94a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 906R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 94b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 906R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 95a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 911R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 95b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 911R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 96a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 912R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 96b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 912R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 97a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 919R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 97b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 919R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 98a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 1D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 98b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 1D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 99a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 7D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 99b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 7D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 100a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 19D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 100b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 19D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 101a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 20D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 101b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 20D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 102a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 21D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 102b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 21D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 103a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 24D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 103b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 24D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 104a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 48D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 104b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 48D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 105a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 52D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 105b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 52D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 106a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 76D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 106b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 76D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 107a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 82D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 107b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 82D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 108a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 83D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 108b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 83D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 109a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 130D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 109b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 130D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 110a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 134D did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 110b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Alkylation 3 Unit, the inlet line pressure drop on pressure relief valve 134D was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documentation that each pressure relief valve and associated piping for all process units have been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure inlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 111a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 231 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 111b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 231 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 112a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 33P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 112b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 33P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 113a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 113b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 114a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PB did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 114b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PB was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 115a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PC did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 115b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 17 PC was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 116a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 182 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 116b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 182 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 117a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 183 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 117b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 183 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 118a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 194 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 118b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 194 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 119a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 119b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 209 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 120a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 232 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 120b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 232 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 121a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 250 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 121b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 250 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 122a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 256 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 122b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 256 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 123a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 290 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 123b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 290 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 124a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 291 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 124b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 291 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 125a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 295 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 125b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 295 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 126a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 126b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 127a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PC did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 127b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 297 PC was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 128a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 30 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 128b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 30 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 129a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 304 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 129b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 304 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 130a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 311 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 130b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 311 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 131a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 314 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 131b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 314 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 132a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 33 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 132b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 33 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 133a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 407 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 133b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 407 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 134a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 54 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 134b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 54 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 135a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 82 P did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 135b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 82 P was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 136a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 89 PA did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 136b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 89 PA was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 137a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 137b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 246R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 138a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 681R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 138b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 681R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 139a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 815R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 139b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 815R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 140a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 817R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 140b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 817R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 141a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 818R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 141b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 818R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 142a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 828R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 142b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 828R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 143a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 832R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 143b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 832R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 144a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 869R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 144b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 869R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 145a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 848R did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Citation 1 Item 145b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, where the outlet pressure drop on pressure relief valve 848R was outside acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards including documenting that each pressure relief valve and associated piping has been evaluated and, if necessary, repaired or replaced to ensure outlet pressure drop is limited in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as API Recommended Practice 520 and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations, repairs, and replacements shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 146a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-C-A was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 146b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-C-A from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 147a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-C-B was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 147b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-C-B from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 148a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-C-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 148b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-C-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 149a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 149b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 150a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 150b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 151a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 151b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 152a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 152b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 153a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 153b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 154a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 154b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 104-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 155a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 119 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 155b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 119 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 156a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 120L,170J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 156b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 120L,170J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 157a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 121-JT was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 157b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 121-JT from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 158a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 124-JT-A was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 158b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 124-JT-A from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 159a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 125-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 159b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 125-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 160a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 130-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 160b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 130-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 161a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 130-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 161b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 130-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 162a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 133-JAT was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 162b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 133-JAT from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 163a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 135-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 163b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 135-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 164a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 140-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 164b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 140-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 165a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 142-c ss was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 165b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 142-c ss from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 166a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 143-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 166b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 143-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 167a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 144-C-1 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 167b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 144-C-1 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 168a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 144-C-1 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 168b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 144-C-1 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 169a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 144-C-2 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 169b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 144-C-2 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 170a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 144-C-2 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 170b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 144-C-2 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 171a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 166-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 171b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 166-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 172a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 169-CC1 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 172b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 169-CC1 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 173a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 169-CC1 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 173b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 169-CC1 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 174a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 169-CC2 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 174b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 169-CC2 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 175a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 172-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 175b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 172-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 176a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 172-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 176b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 172-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 177a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 173-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 177b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 173-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 178a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 173-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 178b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 173-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 179a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 174-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 179b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 174-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 180a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 174-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 180b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 174-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 181a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 177-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 181b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 177-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 182a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 178-LB was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 182b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 178-LB from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 183a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 178-LC was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 183b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 178-LC from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 184a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 184-fa was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 184b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 184-fa from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 185a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 185-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 185b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

a. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 185-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 186a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 185-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 186b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 185-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 187a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 186-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 187b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 186-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 188a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 186-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 188b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 186-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 189a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 187-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 189b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 187-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 190a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 187-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 190b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 187-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 191a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 188-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 191b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 188-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 192a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 188-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 192b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 188-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 193a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 189-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 193b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 189-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 194a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 189-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 194b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 189-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 195a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 190-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 195b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 190-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 196a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 191-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 196b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 191-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 197a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 193-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 197b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 193-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 198a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 194-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 198b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 194-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 199a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 194-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 199b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 194-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 200a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 209-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 200b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 209-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 201a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 209-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 201b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 209-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 202a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 210-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 202b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 210-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 203a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 210-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 203b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 210-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 204a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel K.O. Pot was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 204b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel K.O. Pot from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 205a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 405-LA/LB was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 205b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 405-LA/LB from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 206a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 406-LA/LB was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 206b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 406-LA/LB from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 207a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 409-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 207b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 409-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 208a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 410-CA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 208b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 410-CA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 209a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 410-CB was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 209b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 410-CB from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 210a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 413-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 210b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 413-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 211a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 416-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 211b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 416-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 212a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 417-FA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 212b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 417-FA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 213a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 420-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 213b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 420-F from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 214a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 421-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 214b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 421-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 215a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 423-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 215b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 423-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 216a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 423-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 216b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 423-F from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 217a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 424-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 217b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 424-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 218a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 432-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 218b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 432-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 219a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 435-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 219b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 435-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 220a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 451-CB (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 220b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 451-CB (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 221a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 453-CA (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 221b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 453-CA (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 222a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 454-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 222b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 454-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 223a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 455-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 223b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 455-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 224a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 456-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 224b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 456-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 225a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 457-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 225b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 457-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 226a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 423-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 226b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 423-F from rising above acceptable limits.

  1. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 227a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 460-CA (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 227b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 460-CA (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 228a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 464-C (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 228b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 464-C (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 229a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 467-CA (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 229b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 467-CA (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 230a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 467-CB (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 230b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 467-CB (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 231a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 469-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 231b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 469-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 232a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 472-CA (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 232b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 472-CA (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 233a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 472-CB (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 233b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 472-CB (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 234a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 474-CA (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 234b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 474-CA (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 235a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 474-CB (SS)(TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 235b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 474-CB (SS)(TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 236a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 480-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 236b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 480-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 237a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 502-CA/CB (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 237b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 502-CA/CB (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 238a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 505-CA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 238b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 505-CA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 239a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 506-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 239b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 506-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 240a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 506-CA (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 240b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 506-CA (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 241a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 507-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 241b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 507-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 242a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 509-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 242b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 509-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 243a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 510-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 243b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 510-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 244a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 512-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 244b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 512-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 245a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 514-C (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 245b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 514-C (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 246a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 550-C was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 246b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 550-C from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 247a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 601-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 247b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 601-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 248a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 602-CA (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 248b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 602-CA (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 249a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 602-CA/CB was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 249b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 602-CA/CB from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 250a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 602-CB (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 250b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 602-CB (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 251a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 602-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 251b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 602-F from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 252a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 604-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 252b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 604-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 253a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 611-CA (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 253b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 611-CA (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 254a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 611-CA/CB (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 254b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 611-CA/CB (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 255a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 611-CB (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 255b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 611-CB (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 256a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 611-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 256b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 611-F from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 257a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 611-LC/LD was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 257b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 611-LC/LD from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 258a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-CA (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 258b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-CA (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 259a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-CA/CB (TS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 259b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-CA/CB (TS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 260a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-CB (SS) was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 260b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-CB (SS) from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 261a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-F was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 261b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-F from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 262a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-JA-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 262b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-JA-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 263a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 612-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 263b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 612-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 264a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 614-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 264b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 614-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 265a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 617-L was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 265b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 617-L from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 266a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 617-LA was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 266b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel 617-LA from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 267a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel F 410 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 267b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel F 410 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 268a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel F 816 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 268b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel F 816 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 269a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel SP-212-213 was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 269b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel SP-212-213 from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.
Citation 1 Item 270a       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the need for over pressure protection on pressure vessels as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel STR 513-J was not protected by pressure-relieving devices that would prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits.

Citation 1 Item 270b       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not install over pressure protection for pressure vessels so as to prevent the pressure inside vessel STR 513-J from rising above acceptable limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels, including documenting that each pressure vessel has been evaluated and is protected by pressure-relieving device(s) in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and PressureVessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installations of overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 271a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 2-O-9537-01CS-2PW was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 1, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 271b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 2-O-9537-01CS-2PW that has pressure relief device, 1, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 272a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 102-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 12 PA, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 272b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 102-E that has pressure relief device, 12 PA, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 273a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 102-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 12 PB, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 273b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 102-E that has pressure relief device, 12 PB, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 274a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 14 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 274b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-E that has pressure relief device, 14 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 275a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 14 PA, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 275b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-E that has pressure relief device, 14 PA, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 276a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 14 PB, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 276b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-E that has pressure relief device, 14 PB, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 277a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 15 PA, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 277b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-E that has pressure relief device, 15 PA, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 278a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 15 PB, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 278b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-E that has pressure relief device, 15 PB, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 279a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 15 PC, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 279b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-E that has pressure relief device, 15 PC, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 280a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 15 PD, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 280b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-E that has pressure relief device, 15 PD, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 281a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-E was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 15 PE, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 281b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-E that has pressure relief device, 15 PE, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 282a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 205 F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 177 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 282b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 205 F that has pressure relief device, 177 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 283a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 103-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 191 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 283b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 103-F that has pressure relief device, 191 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 284a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 110-C-1-2-(SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 192 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 284b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 110-C-1-2-(SS) that has pressure relief device, 192 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 285a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 106 - F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 194 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 285b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 106 - F that has pressure relief device, 194 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 286a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 132-C(SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 24 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 286b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 132-C(SS) that has pressure relief device, 24 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 287a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 133-C & 134-C(SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 27 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 287b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 133-C & 134-C(SS) that has pressure relief device, 27 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 288a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 115-J was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 288 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 288b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 115-J that has pressure relief device, 288 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 289a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-BA/BB was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 296 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 289b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-BA/BB that has pressure relief device, 296 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 290a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 2P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 290b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-F that has pressure relief device, 2P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 291a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 106 - F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 30 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 291b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 106 - F that has pressure relief device, 30 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 292a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 109-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 304 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 292b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 109-F that has pressure relief device, 304 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 293a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 109-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 305 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 293b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 109-F that has pressure relief device, 305 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 294a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 330 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 294b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-F that has pressure relief device, 330 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 295a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 332 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 295b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-F that has pressure relief device, 332 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 296a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 119-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 407 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 296b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 119-F that has pressure relief device, 407 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 297a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 100-B, 101-B, 102-B BFW Coils was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 50 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 297b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 100-B, 101-B, 102-B BFW Coils that has pressure relief device, 50 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 298a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 144-J was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 53 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 298b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 144-J that has pressure relief device, 53 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 299a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 6-PO-549-01CS-2PW was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 54 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 299b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 6-PO-549-01CS-2PW that has pressure relief device, 54 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 300a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-J was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 55 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 300b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-J that has pressure relief device, 55 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 301a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 100-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 7 - PA, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 301b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 100-F that has pressure relief device, 7 - PA, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 302a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 100-F was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 7 - PB, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 302b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 100-F that has pressure relief device, 7 - PB, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 303a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 104-JT was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 80 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 303b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 104-JT that has pressure relief device, 80 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 304a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 105-JT was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 81 P, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 304b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 105-JT that has pressure relief device, 81 P, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 305a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 507-C (SS)/508-C (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 235R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 305b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 507-C (SS)/508-C (TS) that has pressure relief device, 235R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 306a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 507-C (SS)/508-C (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 237R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 306b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 507-C (SS)/508-C (TS) that has pressure relief device, 237R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 307a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 502-CA/CB (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 247R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 307b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 502-CA/CB (TS) that has pressure relief device, 247R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 308a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 402-CB (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 261R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 308b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 402-CB (SS) that has pressure relief device, 261R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 309a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 468-CA/CB (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 409R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 309b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 468-CA/CB (TS) that has pressure relief device, 409R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 310a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 402-CA (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 609R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 310b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 402-CA (SS) that has pressure relief device, 609R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 311a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 436-C (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 680R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 311b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 436-C (SS) that has pressure relief device, 680R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 312a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 444-CA/CB (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 704R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 312b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 444-CA/CB (SS) that has pressure relief device, 704R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 313a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 440-CA/CB (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 706R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 313b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 440-CA/CB (SS) that has pressure relief device, 706R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 314a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 401-LB was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 809R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 314b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 401-LB that has pressure relief device, 809R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 315a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 408-CA/CB was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 851R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 315b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 408-CA/CB that has pressure relief device, 851R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 316a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 418-CB/CC (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 852R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 316b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 418-CB/CC (TS) that has pressure relief device, 852R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 317a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 411/414/416-C (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 865R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 317b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 411/414/416-C (SS) that has pressure relief device, 865R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 318a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 403-CA (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 866R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 318b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 403-CA (SS) that has pressure relief device, 866R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 319a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 403-CB (SS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 867R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 319b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 403-CB (SS) that has pressure relief device, 867R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 320a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 433-CA/CB (TS) was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 632R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 320b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 433-CA/CB (TS) that has pressure relief device, 632R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

The alleged violations below have been grouped because they involve similar or related hazards that may increase the potential for injury resulting from an accident.

Citation 1 Item 321a       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer does not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not fully consider and address the adequacy of over pressure protection on pressure vessels, as required by recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Pressure vessel 512-JA was not protected against overpressure for identified relief scenarios in that its pressure relief device, 916R, was not adequate to prevent the pressure inside the vessel from rising above acceptable limits for identified relief scenarios.

Citation 1 Item 321b       Type of Violation:       Willful
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer does not correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits [defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.119] before further use or in a safe and timely manner.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer operates pressure vessel 512-JA that has pressure relief device, 916R, installed that is incorrectly sized and does not provide the necessary relief capacity for identified relief scenarios.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standards for all pressure vessels in the refinery, including documentation that each pressure vessel is evaluated and protected by pressure-relieving device(s) that is appropriate for the vessel in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when the evaluations and installation of adequate overpressure protection shall be completed. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 322       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 100-JD Cooling Water Jacket did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 323       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 100-JE Cooling Water Jacket did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 324       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 103-FA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 325       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 104-J, Lube Oil Cooler (TS) did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 326       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 104-JL, Lube Oil Pump Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 327       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 105-JALMA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 328       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 105-JALA, Aux Pump did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 329       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 112-E, Hydrogen Make-Up Scrubber did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 330       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 109-CC-1 (TS), Spare Intercoolers did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 331       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 109-CC-2 (TS), Spare Intercoolers did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 332       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 112-JAT, 112-JA Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 333       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 113-FA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 334       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 114-J Steam Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 335       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 115-J, Seal Flush Pump did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 336       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 115-JA, Seal Flush Pump did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 337       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 117-F did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 338       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 118-F did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 339       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

a. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 119 Filter #1 did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 340       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 121-JAT Seal, Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 341       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 124-CA2, Debutanizer Ovhd Condenser did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 342       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 124-JAT Seal, Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 343       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 131-F, Flash Gas Compressor did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 344       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 133-JAT Seal did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 345       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 139-C1(TS), E-P Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 346       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 139-C2 (TS), E-P Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 347       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 139-JBT, Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 348       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 139-JCT, Turbine did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 349       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 148-JB, Ethane Propane Pump did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 350       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 144-C1 (TS), Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 351       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 144-C2 (TS), Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 352       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 144-C2 (SS), Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 353       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 166-J, Oil Sump Filter did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard. Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 354       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 178-LC did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 355       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 182-F did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 356       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 185-L did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 357       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 194-C(SS) did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 358       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 194-C(TS) did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 359       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 213-F did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 360       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 221-JA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 361       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 229-CT, Seal Gas Heater did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 362       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 229-CTA, Seal Gas Heater did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 363       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 230-LA, Filter Equipment did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 364       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 230-L, Filter Elements did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 365       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel Fuel Gas K.O. Pot did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 366       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 401-E, Crude Tower System did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 367       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 405-LA, Seal Oil Filter did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 368       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 405-LB, Seal Oil Filter did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 369       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 409-C K.O Pot did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 370       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 417-FA, Tail Gas Collection Pot did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 371       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 423-C, Heavy Naphtha Prod. did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 372       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 424-F, Drain Drum PS 3B Fuel Gas did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 373       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 31-C (TS), Atmos. Gas Oil Flashed did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 374       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 454-C, Crude Tower Ovhd. did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 375       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 469-C, Tail Gas C/W did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 376       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 472-CA (SS), Seal Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 377       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 472-CA (TS), Seal Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 378       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

a. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 472-CB (SS), Seal Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 379       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 472-CB (TS), Seal Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 380       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 503-E, GASO Splitter Tower did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 381       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 402-CB (SS), Hvy Naphtha/Cru Ex did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 382       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 601-L, Crude APH did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 383       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 602-F, Lube Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 384       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 604-L, Crude Ammonia Vaporizer did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 385       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 611-CA (SS), Lube Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 386       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 611-CB (SS), Lube Oil Cooler did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 387       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 611-CB (TS), Lube Oil Coolers did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 388       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 611-CA (TS), Lube Oil Coolers did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 389       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 611-F, Lube Oil Reservoir did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 390       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 612-CA (TS), Lube Oil did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 391       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 612-F, Lube Oil Reservoir did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 392       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 612-L, Vacuum Air Preheaters did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 393       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 617-L, Duplex Strainer for 611-JA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 394       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 617-LA, Duplex Strainer for 611-JA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 395       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-410, J-425 Compressor K.O. Drum did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 396       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-411, Pump Out Pot did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 397       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-816, Peanut Drum did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 398       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel SP-202A did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 399       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel SP-202B did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 400       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Cat Feed Hydrutreater Unit 1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 153-CA did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 401       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Cat Feed Hydrutreater Unit 1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 182-F did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 402       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Coker B Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-223 did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 403       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit No. 1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel C-1B did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 404       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit No. 1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel C-1C did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 405       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Resid Hydritreating Unit Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 384-C-B did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 406       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Sulfur Recovery Unit Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel E-3D1 did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 407       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the UTIL1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-825 did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 408       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the UTIL1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-854 did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 409       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the UTIL1 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel F-802A did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 410       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultraformer 3 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 360-JA-1-FC did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 411       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i): The employer does not maintain information pertaining to the equipment in the process, including the information specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i) paragraphs (A) through (H).

  1. In the Ultraformer 3 Unit, the employer did not maintain written process safety information documenting process equipment for pressure vessels requiring design specification documentation, such as U-1 reports, original construction drawings, and/or engineering evaluations. Pressure vessel 360-J2-FC did not have adequate design specification documentation to determine relief system design and design basis.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the violation. In addition, under 29 CFR 1903.19(e), the employer shall submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to ensure that it is in compliance throughout the refinery with the standard including steps to assure that it has written and accurate process safety information for all pressure vessels at the refinery. The abatement plan shall establish dates during the next three months when surveys shall be completed and the information shall be finally compiled. Once the plan has been fully implemented, the employer must submit certification of its full compliance with the standard.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 412       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Alkylation No. 2 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 413       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Alkylation No. 3 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 414       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Aromatics Recovery A Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 415       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Aromatics Recovery B Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 416       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Aromatics 2 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 417       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Cat Feed Hydrotreater Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 418       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Coker B and Coker C Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 419       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Distillate Desulfurization 100, 200, 300 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 420       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Fluid Cat Cracker 1 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 421       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Fluid Cat Cracker 3 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 422       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Hydrogen Recovery Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 423       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Naphtha Desulfurization Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 424       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Oil Movement Control Center Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 425       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Pipestill 3A Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 426       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Pipestill 3B Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 427       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating Catalyst Handling Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 428       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating 200 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 429       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating 300 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 430       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating 400 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 431       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating 500 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 432       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Resid Hydrotreating 600 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 433       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Sulfur Recovery A Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 434       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Sulfur Recovery B Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 435       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Sulfur Recovery C Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 436       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Sulfur Recovery D Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 437       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Ultracracker Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 438       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Ultraformer 3 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Citation 1 Item 439       Type of Violation:       Willful

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer does not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and that include the applicable operating limits.

  1. In the Ultraformer 4 Unit at the Texas City refinery, the employer does not have written operating procedures that provide clear instructions that contain all applicable operating limits.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation that it has abated the hazard throughout the refinery.

Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:             11/30/2009
Proposed Penalty:             $ 70000.00

Mark R. Briggs
Area Director