[Reserved]
- Part Number:
- Part Number Title:
- Title:
- GPO Source:
[Reserved]
[Reserved]
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
February 18, 1980
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
February 20, 1981
MEMORANDUM FOR: GILBERT J. SAULTER
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
ATTENTION: HERBERT M. KURTZ
THRU: JOHN MILES FIELD COORDINATOR
FROM: BRUCE HILLENBRAND
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FEDERAL COMPLIANCE
AND STATE PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: Citing of Reversed Polarity
This is in reference to our memorandum dated February 6, 1980, on the same subject.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
November 5, 1979
Mr. J. D. Spooner
Vice President and General Sales Manager
Weil Pump Company
1530 N. Fremont Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60622
Dear Mr. Spooner:
This is in response to your recent telegram addressed to Mr. William Simms concerning OSHA's policy on classification of a wet well as a Class 1, Division 1 location.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
December 3, 1979
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
July 26, 1979
Mr. John Schreiner
Executive Vice President
Vacuum Instrument Corporation
6 Stepar Place
Huntington Station, New York 11746
Dear Mr. Schreiner:
This is in response to your recent inquiry to Donald Shay requesting an opinion concerning the installation of electrical equipment.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
November 30, 1977
Mr. K. J. Millerv
Gilbert Associates, Inc.
P. O. Box 1498
Reading, Pennsylvania 19603
Dear Mr. Miller:
This is in response to your letter to Mr. Bunton Nichols, Occupational Safety and Health Office, Houston, Texas, dated September 1, 1977, which was referred to this office for reply. Your letter concerned the applicability of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's requirement for ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection to the Ship Repairing Industry.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
December 8, 1980
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
August 21, 1978
Dean G. Kratz, Attorney
McGrath, North, O'Malley,
Kratz, Dwyer, O'Leary &
Martin, P.C.
300 Continental Building
Omaha, Nebraska 68102
Dear Mr. Kratz:
This is in response to your letter dated July 12, 1978, requesting a permanent variance from section 1910.309(a), Article 502-6(b) National Electrical Code, of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards. Your letter was forwarded to this office to determine if the standard applies in the situation described in your application.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
November 4, 1976
OSHA/Technical Support
Clarification Paint Spray Booth & Spray Areas
All Area Directors
There appears to be some confusion as to the application of 1910.94, 1910.107 and 1910.308 and 309 to paint spray operations. An attempt is being made to clarify the requirements outlined in the standards and their source documents.