Powered by GoogleTranslate

Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 309554483 - Fox Ridge Outfitters, Inc.

Inspection Information - Office: Concord


Inspection Nr: 309554483
Report ID: 0111700
Date Opened: 10/18/2006

Site Address:
Fox Ridge Outfitters, Inc.
400 North Main
Rochester, NH 03867

Mailing Address:
Po Box 5002, Rochester, NH 03866

Union Status: NonUnion


NAICS: 453998/All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores)

Inspection Type: Referral

Scope: Partial

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Safety

Close Conference: 11/28/2006


Case Closed: 01/08/2007

Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Referral 200618239 Yes
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 2 2
Current Violations 2 2
Initial Penalty $8,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,550
Current Penalty $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001 Serious 5A0001 12/05/2006 12/11/2006 $6,300 $6,300 $0 I - Informal Settlement  
2. 01002 Serious 19100132 D01 12/05/2006 12/11/2006 $700 $2,250 $0 I - Informal Settlement  

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 200612414
Event: 10/16/2006
Two Employees Are Injured When Jammed Firearm Discharges

On October 16, 2006, Employee #1 was working for a retail store at which firearms were sold. A coworker had received a Black Diamond .50 caliber inline style muzzleloader at the counter. The customer indicated that it had been double loaded. There were three pellets of Pyrodex, a saboted slug, another three pellets of Pyrodex, and another slug on top of all that in the muzzle. The coworker tried without success to remove the top bullet by using a bullet puller, but the polymer tip in the bullet was too hard to drive the bullet puller into. He then asked Employee #1 to attempt to clear the double load. During this attempt, the weapon discharged, and Employee #1 sustained injuries to his hand or finger. Employee #2, who was just entering the area, received a metal fragment in his eye. Neither Employee #1 nor Employee #2 was hospitalized. It was determined that neither employee who worked on the gun (the coworker and Employee #1) used water or solvent to deactivate the Pyrodex.

Keywords:eye, explosives, gunshot, finger, jammed, manual mat handling, hand

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree Nature Occupation
1 309554483 Non Hospitalized injury Other Occupation not reported
2 309554483 Non Hospitalized injury Other Occupation not reported
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.