Powered by Translate

Zinc Oxide in Workplace Atmosphere

OSHA Method ID-143 | 1985, Revised March 1989

For problems with accessibility in using figures and illustrations, please contact the Salt Lake Technical Center at 801-233-4900.
These procedures were designed and tested for internal use by OSHA personnel. Mention of any company name or commercial product does not constitute endorsement by OSHA.

The tables on this page are best viewed on a desktop, notebook, or tablet computer.

Method Number: ID-143
Matrix: Air

OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits
    Zinc Oxide Fume (Final Rule Limit):

  5 mg/m3 Time Weighted Average (TWA)
10 mg/m3 Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL)

    Zinc Oxide Dust (Final Rule Limit)
        Respirable Fraction:
        Total Dust:

  5 mg/m3 TWA
10 mg/m3 TWA

    Zinc Oxide Fume (Transitional Limit):   5 mg/m3 TWA

    Zinc Oxide Dust (Transitional Limit)
        Respirable Fraction:
        Total Dust:

  5 mg/m3 TWA
15 mg/m3 TWA

Collection Device: A tared, 5-µm, 37-mm polyvinyl chloride filter is used with a personal sampling pump

Recommended Sampling Rate: 2 L/min

Recommended Air Volume: 30 L (STEL), 960 L (TWA)

Analytical Procedure: A suspension of the sample particulate in tetrahydrofuran (THF) is created by dissolving the sample filter in THF and then sonicating. The sample particulate is then deposited onto a silver membrane filter and analyzed by X-ray diffraction.

Detection Limits
    Qualitative:

30 µg zinc oxide

    Quantitative: 50 µg zinc oxide

Precision and Accuracy
    Validation Range:

2.5 to 10 mg/m3 (200-L air sample)

    CV1 0.05
Method Classification: Validated Method

Date (Date Revised): 1985 (March, 1989)

Commercial manufacturers and products mentioned in this method are for descriptive use only and do not constitute endorsements by USDOL-OSHA. Similar products from other sources can be substituted.


Division of Physical Measurements and Inorganic Analyses
OSHA Technical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah

  1. Introduction

    This method describes the collection of airborne zinc oxide (ZnO) in the breathing zone of personnel and the subsequent analysis by X-ray diffraction (XRD).

    1. History
      1. There have been several methods used to analyze for ZnO. These include atomic absorption (AA), colorimetry, gravimetry, titrametry, and XRD. The XRD determination of three or more lines is considered the preferred method, because ZnO can be distinguished from other compounds of zinc (Zn) or metallic Zn. Also, the diffraction method is less tedious than most alternative methods.
      2. The previous analytical method (8.1.) used by the OSHA Salt Lake City Technical Center (OSHA-SLTC) was an AA method. Zinc oxide was collected on a cellulose membrane filter, digested, and analyzed according to reference 8.1. The AA method was not specific for ZnO since only Zn is analyzed.
    2. Principle

      A sample is collected by drawing air at approximately 2 L/min through a pre-weighed polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filter. The filter is post-weighed before submission to the lab for analysis. At the laboratory, the filter is dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF), the sample particulate is suspended in the THF, and then deposited on a silver membrane. The membrane is analyzed by XRD. The X-ray technique is based on the Bragg equation:

      nl = 2d sin q

      Where:

      n = order of diffracted beam

      l = wavelength of X-ray beam

      d = distance between diffracting planes (in angstroms)

      q = angle between incident X-rays and the diffracting planes (in degrees)

      Note: Most X-ray spectrometers are designed to scan using degrees 2q

    3. Advantages and Disadvantages
      1. This method is specific for ZnO; XRD can distinguish crystal structure based on the Bragg equation. The method does not distinguish between dust or fume forms of ZnO.
      2. Zinc oxide can be identified and quantified on three or more different angles of diffraction.
      3. Interferences can be minimized by using alternate angles of diffraction, computer-assisted methods of integration, or wide angle scans and subsequent line matching with diffraction pattern libraries.
      4. This method is accurate and offers better sensitivity compared to previous methods of analysis.
      5. Sample preparation is simple and analysis can be computer-controlled and automated. Also, sample preparation and analysis involves a non-destructive technique. Samples can be reanalyzed at a later date.
      6. A disadvantage is the high cost of instrumentation, especially if equipped with computer hardware.
      7. Another disadvantage is the sophisticated maintenance required for the instrumentation.
    4. Physical and Chemical Properties of ZnO (8.2.)
      CAS No.: 1314-13-2
      Chemical Symbol: ZnO
      Synonyms: china white, zinc white, zincite
      Formula Weight: 81.37
      Crystalline Form: hexagonal
      Specific Gravity: 5.606
      Melting Point: 1975°C
      Solubility*: 0.00016 g/100 mL water at 29°C; soluble in mineral acids, dilute acetic acid and ammonium chloride
      Color: white

      *Tests conducted at the OSHA lab indicated the solubility of ZnO in suspending media such as 2-propanol or THF was insignificant. Zinc oxide is slightly soluble in water.

    5. Uses

      Occupations with potential exposures to Zn and Zn compounds are listed (8.3.):

      • Alloy and electric fuse makers
      • Printing plate makers
      • Roofing makers
      • Metal cutters
      • Shipyard workers
      • Arc welders
      • Electric metallizers, galvanizes and electroplaters
      • Zinc, brass and bronze foundry workers
      • Metal sprayers
      • Braziers
      • Paint manufacturers
      • Smelters
      • Junk metal refiners
  2. Analytical Working Range
    1. Qualitative detection limits when using typical instrumental conditions are:

       

      DiffractionPeak

      Peak° 2q

      IntegrationTime (sec)

      DetectionLimit (µg)

      Primary (1')

      36.30

      1

      30

      Tertiary (3')

      34.46

      1

      30

      Quaternary (4')

      56.62

      1

      30

      Quinternary (5')

      62.88

      1

      30

      Note: 2q peaks are more informative than absolute. Peak values may vary slightly.

    2. The quantitative detection limit for the analytical method was 50 µg. The determination was performed using the primary or most sensitive ZnO diffraction line.
    3. The range for samples containing mixtures and impurities is dependent upon the amount of interfering substances and X-ray absorbing substances present. A total sample weight in the range of 0.1 to 3 mg is recommended. Samples with weights in excess of 3 mg can be analyzed by deposition onto multiple silver membranes.
  3. Method Performance
    1. The overall coefficient of variation (CV) for ZnO fume was reported to be 0.088 (8.4.).
    2. 3.2. The analytical method was tested at the OSHA lab in the range of 2.5 to 10 mg/m3. The CV for the analytical method was 0.05. This value was determined from known samples in the range of 500 to 2,000 µg (N = 18) for the primary ZnO diffraction line. The mean recovery was 99.98% (8.5.).
  4. Interferences

    According to data listed in a computer search of the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Studies (JCPDS) powder diffraction file (8.9.), several compounds have diffraction peaks that can potentially interfere with ZnO. Many of these compounds are listed in Appendix A.

    1. The secondary ZnO line is normally not scanned. The possibility of silver chloride formation on the surface of silver membranes used in sample analyses has limited the use of this line. Silver chloride has a diffraction peak in close proximity to the secondary ZnO line.
    2. Some elements (iron, in particular) can cause appreciable X-ray fluorescence which will result in high background intensity. This situation can be circumvented by using a diffracted beam monochromator.
    3. If a severe interference is present on the primary ZnO line, analytical results are reported using another diffraction line.
    4. The presence of interference can be verified and usually identified by XRD analysis. Interfering peaks are usually resolved at the OSHA-SLTC using custom in-house software (8.7.). Similar software developed by the instrument manufacturers or in-house can also be used.
    5. Wide-angle scans are also performed to help identify interferences or assist in identification of ZnO. These scans are usually performed with line profile libraries where the diffraction lines of the sample are compared to lines of known compounds contained in the libraries.
  5. Sampling
    1. Sampling Equipment
      1. Sample assembly:
      2. Filter holder consisting of a two- or three-piece cassette, 37-mm diameter.

        Backup pad, 37-mm, cellulose.

        Low ash PVC membrane filter, 37-mm, 5-µm pore size [part no. 625413, Mine Safety Appliances (MSA), Pittsburgh, PA or cat. no. P-503700, Omega Specialty Instrument Co., Chelmsford, MA].


        Note: During preparation for analysis, the sample is dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF). Certain acrylic copolymers added to PVC filters are insoluble in THF. If the membrane filter composition is unknown, a laboratory test should be conducted with THF to determine suitability before use.


      3. For respirable samples only, a cyclone is also used. Cyclone: Nylon, 10-mm (BDX-99R, part no. 7010048-1, Sensidyne Inc., Largo, FL, or part no. 456243, MSA, Pittsburgh, PA).
      4. Pump calibration system: Stop watch and bubble tube or electronic meter.
      5. Sampling pump: For fume or nonrespirable dust samples, calibrate the personal sampling pump to approximately 2 L/min. Each pump must be calibrated with a representative sampler in-line to minimize errors associated with uncertainties in the volume sampled. For respirable samples, calibrate the pump with a cyclone in-line and use a flow rate of approximately 1.7 L/min.
      6. Assorted flexible tubing.
      7. Analytical balance (0.01 mg).
    2. Sampling Procedure
      1. Desiccate and then weigh the PVC filter before sampling.
      2. Place the pre-weighed PVC filter and a cellulose backup pad in a two- or three-piece cassette.
      3. Attach the cassette to a calibrated personal sampling pump using flexible tubing. For respirable samples, attach a cyclone to the cassette.
      4. Place the sampling assembly in the breathing zone of the worker or sampling area and place the pump in an appropriate position. For fume or nonrespirable dust samples, take up to 960 L of air through the filter cassette at approximately 2 L/min. For respirable samples, take up to 816 L at approximately 1.7 L/min. Do not allow the cyclone to be inverted during or after sampling.
      5. Check the pump and sampling assembly periodically to verify performance and to assure that the filter is not overloaded. If the filter becomes overloaded during the sampling interval, replace it with another filter.
      6. Terminate sampling at the predetermined time and record the pump flow rate and collection time. Remove the filter, being careful not to lose any particulate. Desiccate and then weigh the filter. Replace the filter, and then firmly seal the cassette with plastic plugs in both the inlet and outlet ports. Calculate the net weight gain and the weight/air volume ratio of the filter. If this ratio is less than the Permissible Exposure Limit, do not submit the sample for ZnO analysis. Respirable dust samples are also not submitted to the lab; these samples are gravimetrically compared to the PEL of 5 mg/m3 for respirable particulate.
      7. Record on the OSHA 91 form all pertinent sample data and any potential interferences. When other compounds are known or suspected to be present in the air, such information, including their suspected identities, should be transmitted with the samples.
      8. With each batch of up to 20 samples, submit an appropriate blank filter for analysis.
      9. Seal the filter cassette and identify it with an OSHA Form 21. Mail samples to the laboratory in a suitable container designed to prevent damage.
    3. Bulk samples

      In order of laboratory preference, bulk samples may be one of following:

        1. a high-volume filter sample

        2. a representative settled dust (rafter) sample

        3. a sample of the bulk material in the workplace which is considered to be ZnO.

      The type of bulk sample should be stated on the OSHA 91 and cross-referenced to the appropriate air sample(s).

  6. Analysis
    1. Safety Precautions
      1. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) has a low flash point, -14°C (6°F), and is extremely flammable. Always use THF in a hood. THF is an ether which can form explosive peroxides upon exposure to air; therefore, it should be stored in closed containers. Always use latex gloves, a labcoat, and safety glasses when handling THF.
      2. Parlodion and isopentyl acetate are flammable.
      3. Always use a hood when working with dry ZnO.
      4. Most X-ray diffractometers have built-in devices to prevent X-ray exposure. These devices should not be adjusted, removed, or overridden by unauthorized personnel for any reason.
      5. A bench top warning light (yellow) is recommended. When lit, the warning light indicates the X-ray generator is powered up.
      6. Most X-ray spectrometers have shutter devices which allow or prevent X-rays from entering the sample chamber. These devices should not be adjusted, removed, or overridden by unauthorized personnel for any reason. Instrument operators should familiarize themselves with correct operation of the shutters. Sample chamber access should only be allowable when X-rays from the source are completely blocked. These shutters should be routinely checked for proper operation.
      7. An additional Geiger type alarm monitor to measure the general work area is recommended. The monitor can be interfaced to the X-ray generator to provide an additional safety interlock.
      8. Avoid inserting fingers into the sample compartment. Use forceps to change samples.
      9. Radiation monitors are worn by all X-ray operators. These monitors consist of film badges and finger rings which are periodically analyzed to detect exposure to low-level radiation.
    2. Analytical Equipment
      1. X-ray diffractometer system consisting of:

        Automated Powder Diffractometer (APD).
        X-ray Generator.
        Long, fine-focus copper target X-ray tube.
        Scintillation counter detector.
        X-ray accessories include: pulse-height analyzer, graphite monochromator, 2q compensating slit, 1° receiving slit, and sample spinner.
        Recirculating cooling system for the X-ray tube.

      2. Computer system consisting of:

        Hardware and software for data reduction and graphic presentations.
        Interface: Between the computer and the automated powder diffractometer an optical isolator and a mechanically operated switch have been used at OSHA-SLTC. Newer X-ray systems are usually equipped with computers already interfaced.
        Line profile library (JCPDS-International Center for Diffraction Data Powder Diffraction File, JCPDS, Swarthmore, PA).

      3. Standard and sample preparation:

        Centrifuge tubes: Round bottom 40-mL (Pyrex 8260).
        Drying oven.
        Explosion-proof hot plate (Model HP-11515B, Sybron/Thermolyne, Dubuque, IA).
        Filtration apparatus, 25 mm, (Filter Holder Hydrosol Manifold, cat. no. XX25 047 00, filtering clamps, cat. no. XX10 025 03, fritted glass bases with stoppers, cat. no. XX10 025 02, and glass funnels, cat. no. XX10 025 11, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).
        Forceps.
        Latex gloves (Cat. no. 8852, American Pharmaseal Lab., Glendale, CA).
        Liquid nitrogen cold-trap system for suspending media collection (dewar, polypropylene vacuum flask, liquid nitrogen, etc.).
        Micro-analytical balance (0.01 mg).
        Plastic petri dishes (Product no. 7242, Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI).
        Silver membrane filters: Diameter 25-mm, 0.45-µm pore size (Cat. no. FM25-0.45, Osmonics, Inc. , Minnetonka, MN).
        Teflon sheet, 0.3 to 1 mm thick.
        Vacuum system.Volumetric pipettes, eyedropper, volumetric flasks and graduated cylinders.
        Ultrasonic bath.

      4. Bulk sample preparation for membrane deposition:

        Freezer mill (Model no. 6700, Spex Industries, Edison, NJ).
        Mortar and pestle.
        Sieve or sonic sifter: Sieve, 325 mesh (or Model ATML3P Sonic Sifter with 325 mesh sieve, ATM Corporation, Milwaukee, WI).

    3. Reagents - All chemicals should be reagent grade or better.
      1. Tetrahydrofuran (THF).
      2. Parlodion (Pyroxylin).
      3. Isopentyl (Isoamyl) acetate.
      4. Parlodion in isopentyl acetate, 1.5% (w/v): Dissolve 1.5 g of parlodion in isopentyl acetate and dilute to 100 mL with isopentyl acetate.
      5. Zinc oxide standard, < 325 mesh.
      6. 2-propanol.
    4. Standard Preparation
      1. Preparation of ZnO stock standards:

        Dry the ZnO standard for 2 h at 110°C. This material is used for stock and working standards.

          1. Prepare three suspensions of ZnO standard in 2-propanol by weighing 10, 50, and 500 mg of the ZnO to the nearest 0.01 mg. Quantitatively transfer each to a 1-L volumetric flask using 2-propanol, and bring each to half volume.

          2. Disperse the ZnO in the 2-propanol by using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. Remove from the bath and allow to cool to room temperature for 15 min. Dilute each flask to the mark with 2-propanol.

      2. Preparation of ZnO working standards:

          1. Prepare a series of working standards on silver membranes from 10-, 50-, and 500-µg/mL stock ZnO suspensions by pipetting appropriate aliquots using the procedure outlined in steps 3 through 5. Prepare three sets of the standards listed below. These will be used to construct the calibration curve.

          Stock Standards
          (µg/mL)

          Aliquot
          (mL)

          Working Standards
          (µg)

          500

          2, 4, 6

          1,000, 2,000, 3,000

          50

          2, 5, 10

          100, 250, 500

          10

          3, 5

          30, 50

          2. Assemble the filtering apparatus and liquid nitrogen cold trap. Connect the cold trap to the filtering apparatus to collect the waste suspending media (2-propanol or THF). The waste vapors should not enter the vacuum pump.

          3. Center a silver membrane on a fritted-glass base of the filtering apparatus. Also center the glass chimney on top of the base and secure it with a clamp.

          4. Add a stirring bar to the stock standard suspension and withdraw aliquots using the following technique:

            a. Place the flask on a magnetic stirrer and turn the stirrer on until a uniform suspension is achieved.

            b. Turn off the stirrer, remove and invert the flask, allowing the stirring bar to slide into the neck.

            c. Shake the flask vigorously to ensure an even suspension.

            d.Cautiously revert the flask and return it to the stirrer.

            e.Turn on the stirrer and immediately withdraw an aliquot from the center of the stirred solution using an appropriate volumetric pipette (care should be taken not to withdraw solution above the volume mark of the pipette).

          5. With the vacuum off, place 2 mL of 2-propanol in the chimney of the previously assembled vacuum filtering apparatus. Transfer the pipetted aliquot to the chimney. After the transfer, bring the total volume in the chimney to 20 mL with 2-propanol.

          6. Apply vacuum to the filtering apparatus, drawing the 2-propanol through it. This should result in a thin, even layered deposition of ZnO onto the silver membrane. Do not rinse the chimney after the ZnO has been deposited on the membrane. Rinsing can disturb the thin layer deposition just created. Vacuum should be applied for sufficient time to dry the membrane.

          7. Carefully disassemble the chimney and clamp. Remove the silver membrane from the fritted-glass base using forceps. Place 2 drops of 1.5% parlodion solution on a glass slide. Fix the standard to the membrane by placing the bottom side of the membrane in the parlodion solution. By capillary action, the membrane draws the parlodion solution to the ZnO surface. Place a Teflon sheet on top of an explosion-proof hot plate which is set at the lowest setting. Then place the membrane on top of this heated Teflon sheet. When dry, place the fixed ZnO standard in a labeled Petri dish.

          8. Inspect the deposition for uniformity; clumping indicates that insufficient sonication was used. The standard will have to be remade if a significant amount of clumping occurs.

    5. Sample Preparation
      1. When sample weights are greater than 3 mg, aliquots are taken to achieve depositions within the working range.
      2. Examine the filter and backup pad to determine if any breakthrough to the backup pad has occurred. If there is significant breakthrough, the sample is either not analyzed or results are reported with a disclaimer (see Section 7.2.3. for reporting results).
      3. Full-shift samples having calculated weight/volume ratios less than the PEL are normally not analyzed.
      4. Filters:

        Carefully transfer the air sample (PVC filter) from the cassette to a round-bottom 40-mL centrifuge tube. Add 10 mL THF to dissolve the filter and suspend the sample. Sonicate the sample suspension for 5 to 10 min. Quantitatively transfer the suspension with rinses of THF to a glass chimney of the vacuum filtering apparatus (described in Section 6.4.2., step 2). The total volume in the chimney should not exceed 20 mL. Apply a vacuum to achieve a thin, even deposition of sample on the membrane. Do not rinse the chimney after the vacuum has been applied. Remove the membrane and fix the deposition to the membrane in the same manner as for a standard (Section 6.4.2., step 7).

      5. Bulks:

        To prevent the possibility of contamination, a separate filtering apparatus should be used for bulk preparation.

          1. Bulk samples approximating respirable particle size:Weigh an aliquot of 1 to 2 mg on a PVC filter, and place in a round bottom centrifuge tube.

          2. Non-respirable bulks:Grind the sample to a fine powder using either a mortar and pestle or a freezer mill. Then size the sample, using a 325-mesh sieve or sonic sifter. This results in a sample particle size of less than 45 µm. An aliquot of the sized sample is weighed on a PVC filter and placed in a round bottom centrifuge tube.

        Add THF and deposit the weighed sample onto a silver membrane in the same fashion as an air sample. Care must be taken when transferring the membrane before fixing. Fix the sample as described in Section 6.4.2., step 7.

    6. Analytical Procedure

      Refer to the Standard Operating Procedure (8.8.) or instrument manuals for system startup and initialization procedures.

      1. The X-ray generator is operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. Using forceps, transfer a standard from the Petri dish to a sample spindle or sample holder. If using a sample spindle, secure the standard to the spindle using Vaseline or a retaining ring. Place the spindle or holder into the sample chamber. Turn on the sample spinner.
      2. Enter the following information into the controlling unit:

          1. 2q limits for each analytical line

          2. 2q scanning increment (0.02° 2q)

          3. Integration and background counting times (1 s)

          4. Calibration using the secondary silver line (44.33° 2q)

          5. Present 2q location of the X-ray instrument

          Normal analytical parameters are:

          <--------------------- 2q Values ------------------------->

          Zinc Oxide Scanning Range Peak Location Peak Range
          1' 35.50 to 36.80 36.30 36.25 to 36.35
          3' 33.80 to 35.10 34.46 34.41 to 34.51
          4' 55.90 to 57.20 56.62 56.57 to 56.67
          5' 62.10 to 63.40 62.88 62.83 to 62.93

          Note: The peak locations listed are more informational than absolute. The actual peak is dependent on instrument and sample conditions and may vary slightly.

      3. Confirm the presence of ZnO by analyzing at least three of the lines listed above. The secondary ZnO line is not listed because the primary diffraction line for silver chloride is in the general proximity and could cause a positive interference.
      4. A custom analytical computer program is used by OSHA-SLTC to analyze samples by XRD. Directions for use and documentation of this system can be found in the X-ray documentation manual (8.7.) and in Appendix B. Other programs can be designed or obtained from X-ray system manufacturers.
      5. Instrument considerations:
        • 1. Perform a silver line angle calibration (44.33° 2q) before each standard or sample is analyzed.

          2. Scan the standard or sample over the selected 2q range in 0.02-degree increments (1 s each).

          3. A standard is analyzed after every fourth or fifth sample to assure correct instrumental operation.

        For each sample or standard, the peak location of the secondary silver diffraction calibration line is used as an initial reference point. If the silver line intensity of a sample is much less than a standard, self-absorption of X-rays has occurred. This is most likely due to the sample matrix and can be remedied by:

          1. Releasing the sample from the silver membrane

          2. Dividing the sample into aliquots

          3. Depositing each aliquot onto a membrane

  7. Calculations

    Prepare a linear regression concentration-response curve by plotting the concentration of the standards in µg versus counts. Blank correct the samples and then calculate the exposure as:

    mg/m3 ZnO =

    µg found


    air volume (L)


    Note: If aliquots of a sample were taken and analyzed, calculations are adjusted according to the size and number of aliquots. Results from each aliquot are combined if the sample was split into a series of aliquots. If only one aliquot was taken, the result (Analyte mg/m3) is multiplied by:

    total suspension volume


    aliquot volume taken


    1. Zinc oxide PEL

      The PELs for ZnO (8.9.) are listed on the cover page of this document.

    2. Reporting Results
      1. Air sample results are reported to the industrial hygienist as mg/m3 ZnO. When peak limits are within acceptable ranges and ZnO amounts are in agreement on at least two, preferably three lines, the reported ZnO value is taken from the most sensitive, interference-free (or interference resolved) line. If interferences are present, the analyst should use available reintegration programs to resolve the interferences or report results on a less sensitive line.
      2. For bulk samples, the results are reported as approximate % ZnO.
      3. Particulate present on the backup pad constitutes some sample loss. Occasionally this may be seen and can be due to a poor cassette seal on the filter, improper positioning of the filter, or poor quality control of the filter and/or cassette. A note indicating that some of the sampled material was found on the backup pad and the reported value may be lower than actual is relayed to the compliance officer.
  8. References
    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Analytical Laboratory: OSHA Manual of Analytical Methods (OSHA-SLCAL Method No. I-1). Salt Lake City, UT. 1977.
    2. Weast, R.C., ed.: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 57th ed., Boca Raton, FL: Chemical Rubber Company Press, 1976, pp B176 - B177.
    3. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Criteria for a Recommended Standard ... Occupational Exposure to Zinc Oxide (DHEW/NIOSH Publ. No. 76-104), Cincinnati, OH, 1975, p 79.
    4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. (Method 7502) edited by P.M. Eller (DHHS/NIOSH Pub. 84-100), Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1984.
    5. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Analytical Laboratory: OSHA Laboratory Quality Control Division Data by R.G. Adler. Salt Lake City, UT. 1981 (unpublished).
    6. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS): Powder Diffraction File 1988, Swarthmore, PA: International Center for Diffraction Data, 1988.
    7. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Analytical Laboratory: X-ray Documentation Manual by E.V. Thomas and M.C. Rose. Salt Lake City, UT. 1983 (unpublished).
    8. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Analytical Laboratory: Standard Operating Procedure--X-Ray Diffraction. Salt Lake City, UT. In progress (unpublished).
    9. "Air Contaminants; Final Rule": Federal Register 54:12 (19 Jan. 1989). pp. 2521-2523.

Appendix A

Potential Interferences (Also see note below)

Primary ZnO Line

Interferent Name, Formula

PDF No. *

Aluminum Chloride, AlCl3

22-10, 1-1133

Ammonium Zinc Chloride, (NH4)3ZnCl5

30-69

Ammonium Zinc Sulfate, (NH4)2Zn(SO4)2·6H2O

35-767

Calcium Aluminum Silicate, CaAl2SiO6

31-249

Chaoite, C

22-1069

Ferric Oxide, e-Fe2O3, Fe2O3

16-653, 25-1402

Ferrous Silicate, Fe2SiO4

12-284, 29-720, 34-178

Lead Carbonate, PbCO3

5-417

Magnesium Silicate, Mg2SiO4

13-230, 34-189, 34-556

Manganese Oxide, MnO

4-326

Nickel Chloride, NiCl2

22-765, 1-1134

Tridymite, SiO2

14-260, 18-1170

Silver Chloride, AgCl

22-1326

Talc, Mg3Si4O10(OH)2

19-770

Titanium Dioxide, TiO2

21-1236, 35-88, 29-1360, 21-1276, 23-1446

Zinc, Zn

4-831

 

Secondary ZnO Line**

Interferent Name, Formula

PDF No.*


Silver Chloride, AgCl

22-1326, 31-1238

Tertiary ZnO Line**

Interferent Name, Formula

PDF No.*


Ammonium Zinc Chloride, (NH4)2ZnCl4

2-155

Ammonium Zinc Chloride, (NH4)3ZnCl5

30-69

Ferrous Silicate, FeSiO4

34-178

Magnesium Silicate, Mg2SiO4

34-556

Manganese Oxide, MnO

7-730

Manganese Sulfide, MnS

6-518

Montmorillonite, 18A or 21A

12-219, 29-1499

Potassium Aluminum Silicate, KAlSiO4

31-965, 33-989, 33-988, 11-313

Talc, Mg3Si4O10(OH)2

19-770, 13-558, 29-1493

Tridymite, SiO2

14-260

 

Quarternary ZnO Line**

Interferent Name, Formula

PDF No.*


Ferric Oxide, g-Fe2O3

24-81

Ferrous Silicate, Fe2SiO4

34-178

Magnesium Silicate, Mg2SiO4

34-189, 34-556

Manganese Oxide, MnO

4-326

Silicon Dioxide, SiO2

34-717

Titanium Dioxide, TiO2

29-1360, 21-1276

 

Quinternary ZnO Line**

Interferent Name, Formula

PDF No.*


Aluminum Chloride, AlCl3

1-1133

Ferric Oxide, e-Fe2O3, Fe2O3, g-Fe2O3, Fe2O3

16-653, 33-664, 24-81, 25-1402

Magnesium Silicate, Mg2SiO4

34-189

Titanium Dioxide, TiO2

21-1236

*PDF No. = JCPDS Powder Diffraction File Number

**Only the most significant interference is listed for the secondary ZnO line.

Note: The majority of the analytes listed above will most likely not be present when sampling industrial operations which produce ZnO exposures. This list is presented as line-matches found in literature and not as definitive interferences. Some of these interferences may occur only when a large amount of interferent is present or at a temperature other than normal laboratory conditions. A substance is listed as a potential interference if one or more sensitive lines of that substance has a peak within ±0.65° 2q of the ZnO line.

Appendix B

Graphics and Calculations - Custom OSHA-SLTC Program

A custom OSHA-SLTC program reads and stores diffraction count data and evaluates or presents output data in the following ways:

    1. Uses a symmetric five-point digital filter (weights = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 0.8, 0.6) to smooth the spectral count data.

    2. Identifies peaks by maximum counts.

    3. Determines upper and lower 2q integration limits.

    4. Chooses the integration method (either valley-to-valley or perpendicular drop) by observation of background and signal counts.

    5. Integrates the peak by summing counts over the selected integration range.

    6. Calculates the concentration of analyte in total µg/m3.

    7. Generates a hard copy report. An example of a report used at OSHA-SLTC is shown in Figure 1.


This program also allows the analyst to modify the computer selection of integration limits and method for each diffraction peak. A graphic representation of the scan can be displayed and an example of a 500 µg ZnO standard is shown in Figure 1. Areas of integration are shaded and outlying areas are non-shaded. The abbreviation "NORM CNTS" contained within the Figure stands for normalized counts (total counts/counting time). Other in-house or commercially available software programs can be used to minimize interferences and clarify results.

Zinc Oxide Diffraction Pattern - 500 µg ZnO Standard

500 ZNO

500ZNO
AIR VOL. 1.00 L box -STANDARD-
SAMPLE WT. 500. UG

AG CAL. 19484       COUNTS AT 44.28 DEG.

PRI ZNO
PEAK 36.30
LOW LIMIT 35.58
UP LIMIT 36.76
INT TIME 2
NORM CNTS 74905
EST UG
fig
TERT ZNO
PEAK 34.46
LOW LIMIT 33.92
UP LIMIT 35.00
INT TIME 2
NORM CNTS 31411
EST UG
fig
4TH ZNO
PEAK 56.60
LOW LIMIT 55.98
UP LIMIT 57.16
INT TIME 2
NORM CNTS 24324
EST UG
fig
5TH ZNO
PEAK 62.86
LOW LIMIT 62.16
UP LIMIT 63.26
INT TIME 2
NORM CNTS 18186
EST UG
fig
Zinc Oxide Diffraction Pattern - 500 µg ZnO Standard

Figure 1

Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close