There are three threshold considerations in planning for pedestrian safety in temporary traffic control zones on highways and streets:
In accommodating the needs of pedestrians at work sites, it should always be remembered that the range of pedestrians that can be expected is very wide, including the blind, the hearing impaired, and those with walking handicaps. All pedestrians need protection from potential injury and a smooth, clearly delineated travel path.
Therefore, every effort should be made to separate pedestrian movement from both work site activity and adjacent traffic. Whenever possible, signing should be used to direct pedestrians to safe street crossings in advance of an encounter with a temporary traffic control zone. Signs should be placed at intersections so that pedestrians, particularly in high-traffic-volume urban and suburban areas, are not confronted with mid-block work sites that will induce them to skirt the temporary traffic control zone or make a mid-block crossing. It must be recognized that pedestrians will only infrequently retrace their steps to make a safe crossing. Consequently, ample advance notification of sidewalk closures is critically important. Refer to figures TA-28 and TA-29, section 6H-3 for typical traffic control device usage and techniques for pedestrian movement through work areas.
When pedestrian movement through or around a work site is necessary, the aim of the engineer should be to provide a separate, safe footpath without abrupt changes in grade or terrain. Judicious use of special warning and control devices may be helpful for certain difficult work area situations. These include rumble strips, changeable message signs, hazard identification beacons, flags, and warning lights. Flagger activated audible warning devices may be used to alert pedestrians of the approach of erratic vehicles. Also, whenever it is feasible, closing off the work site from pedestrian intrusions is preferable to channelizing pedestrian traffic along the site solely with temporary traffic control devices such as cones, tubular markers, barricades, or drums. If the possibility of vehicle impact is very low, chain link or other suitable fencing, placed well away from traffic, is acceptable. Solid fencing with plywood, however, can create sight distance restrictions at intersections and at work site access cuts. Care must be taken not to create fenced areas that are vulnerable to splintering or fragmentation by vehicle impacts. Similarly, temporary traffic control devices used to delineate a temporary traffic control zone pedestrian walkway must be lightweight and, when struck, present a minimum threat to pedestrians, workers, and impacting vehicles. Only minimally necessary ballasting with safe, lightweight materials should be used with these devices.
Movement by work vehicles and equipment across designated pedestrian paths should be minimized and, when necessary, should be controlled by flaggers or temporary traffic control. Cuts into work areas across pedestrian walkways should be kept to a minimum, because they often create unacceptable changes in grade and rough or muddy terrain. Pedestrians cannot be expected to traverse these areas willingly. They will tend to avoid the cuts by attempting non-intersection crossings.
At work sites of significant duration, especially in urban areas with high pedestrian volumes, and where falling debris is a concern (such as work on overhead structures), a canopied walkway is frequently needed to protect pedestrians from falling debris. These covered walkways should be sturdily constructed and adequately lit for nighttime use.
In places where pedestrians are judged especially vulnerable to impact by errant vehicles, all foot traffic should be separated and protected by longitudinal barrier systems. Where a barrier is clearly needed, it should have sufficient strength and low deflection characteristics, to keep vehicles from intruding into the pedestrian space. Further, short, non continuous segments of longitudinal systems, such as concrete barriers, must be avoided because they nullify the containment and redirective capabilities of the design, increase the potential for serious injury to both vehicle occupants and pedestrians, and encourage the presence of blunt, leading ends. All upstream leading ends that are present shall be appropriately flared or protected with properly installed and maintained impact attenuators. With regard to concrete barriers in particular, it is very important to ensure that adjacent segments are properly joined to effect the overall strength required for the system to perform properly.
It has been determined through study and experience that vertical curbs cannot prevent vehicle intrusions onto sidewalks. As a consequence, normal vertical curbing is not a satisfactory substitute for positive barriers when these are clearly needed. Similarly, contractor-constructed wooden railings, chain-link fencing with horizontal pipe runs, and similar systems placed directly adjacent to vehicle traffic are not acceptable substitutes for crashworthy positive barriers; when struck, they are dangerous to vehicle occupants, workers, and pedestrians. In many instances, temporary positive barriers may be necessary to prevent pedestrians from unauthorized movements into the active work area and to prevent conflicts with traffic by eliminating the possibility of mid-block crossings.
If a high potential exists for vehicle incursions into the pedestrian space, judgment must be exercised as to whether to reroute pedestrians or use barriers. Normally, standard traffic control devices can satisfactorily delineate a temporary traffic control zone pedestrian path, but fail-safe channelization can never be guaranteed with these devices because of the gaps between them. Tape, rope, or plastic chain strung between devices can help discourage pedestrian movements off the designated pathway.
Good engineering judgment in each temporary traffic control zone situation should readily determine the extent of pedestrian needs. The engineer in charge of traffic control for temporary traffic control zones should provide both a sense of security and safety for pedestrians walking past work sites and consistent, unambiguous channelization to maintain foot traffic along the desired travel paths.
Of equal importance to the safety of the public traveling through the temporary traffic control zone is the safety of the worker performing the many varied tasks within the work site. work areas present temporary and constantly changing conditions that are unexpected by the traveler. Further, these work area conditions almost always present situations that are more confusing for the driver. This creates an even higher degree of vulnerability for the personnel on or near the roadway.
Following the Fundamental Principles noted above in Section 6B will usually provide the degree of control and traffic operation that will bring about safe conditions for the worker. of particular importance is maintaining work areas with traffic flow inhibited as little as possible, providing standard and clear traffic control devices that get the driver's attention and provide positive direction.
Below are key elements of traffic control management that should be considered in any procedure for assuring worker safety:
Like other provisions of work area safety set forth in this part of the MUTCD, the various traffic control techniques must be applied by qualified persons after appropriate engineering studies and with sound engineering judgment and common sense.Back to Top
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.