The burden and cost of poor patient safety, a leading cause of death in the United States, has been well-documented and is now a major focus for most healthcare institutions. Less well-known is the elevated incidence of work-related injury and illness among healthcare workers and the enormous toll of injury and illness on the workers, their families, healthcare institutions, and ultimately on patient safety. These lamentable circumstances occur side-by-side under, quite literally, the same roof. It is not surprising that, for better or for worse, that patient and worker safety often go hand-in-hand, they share the same foundation – organizational safety culture.
With the publication of the Institute of Medicine"s seminal public health report in 1999, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System1, patient safety, or "quality of care" became a national priority. The IOM committee stated its belief that a safer environment for patients would also be a safer environment for workers and vice versa, because both are tied to many of the same underlying cultural and systemic issues. As cases in point, hazards to health care workers because of lapses in infection control, fatigue, or faulty equipment may result in injury or illness not only to workers but also to patients and others in the institution. Workers who are concerned for their safety or physical or psychological health – who must constantly make accommodations to a work environment in which their safety and health is not seen as a priority, will not be able to provide error-free care to patients. It is clear that efforts to reduce the rate of medical error will not be successful if they are not linked with efforts to prevent work-related injury and illness.
Several studies have found organizational factors to be the most significant predictor of safe work behaviors. Studies of hospital-based healthcare workers found that those who perceived that their institution had a strong commitment to safety were much more likely to be compliant with standard precautions than those who did not. Other studies have demonstrated that interventions targeted at improving organizational support for employee health and safety resulted in enhanced compliance with standard precautions. One study found that nurses were significantly more likely to report that they adhered to the recommended use of facial protection (e.g., respirators, surgical masks, and eye/face protection) when they felt that management made health and safety a high priority, took all reasonable steps to minimize hazards, encouraged employees" involvement in health and safety issues, and actively worked to protect employees. Other studies in industrial settings have shown that safety culture has an important influence on implementation of training skills and knowledge.
The lack of a safety culture as a contributing factor to healthcare worker noncompliance with recommended infection control guidance is not a newly recognized problem. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"s Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee has noted that "several hospital-based studies have linked measures of safety culture with both employee adherence to safe practices and reduced exposures to blood and body fluids."2 They noted that organizational characteristics, including safety culture, influence healthcare personnel adherence to recommended infection control practices and, therefore, are important factors in preventing transmission of infectious agents.
An injury and illness prevention program is a proactive process to help employers find and fix workplace hazards before workers are hurt. We know these programs can be effective at reducing injuries, illnesses, and fatalities. Many workplaces have already adopted such approaches, for example as part of OSHA's cooperative programs. Not only do these employers experience dramatic decreases in workplace injuries, but they often report a transformed workplace culture that can lead to higher productivity and quality, reduced turnover, reduced costs, and greater employee satisfaction. Injury and illness prevention programs are not new, nor are they untested. Most large companies whose safety and health achievements have been recognized through government or industry awards cite their use of injury and illness prevention programs as their key to success.
A basic prerequisite for preventing injuries and illnesses is knowledge of the types, location, and underlying reasons for their occurrence in the workplace. A readily available resource to assist in determining this information is the employer’s OSHA 300 log. Through careful review and analysis of the log, the employer can develop a roadmap to prevention and tailor corrective actions specific to the situations found in his or her workplace. Further information, and possible solutions, can be obtained by soliciting input and involvement of frontline workers.
Most successful injury and illness prevention programs include a similar set of commonsense elements that focus on finding all hazards in the workplace and developing a plan for preventing and controlling those hazards. Management leadership and active worker participation are essential to ensuring that all hazards are identified and addressed. Finally, workers need to be trained about how the program works and the program needs to be periodically evaluated to determine whether improvements need to be made. These basic elements – management leadership, worker participation, hazard identification and assessment, hazard prevention and control, education and training, and program evaluation and improvement – are common to almost all existing health and safety management programs. Each element is important in ensuring the success of the overall program, and the elements are interrelated and interdependent. Similarly, the 1999 IOM report on medical errors in the healthcare sector emphasized the pivotal role of system failures and the benefits of a strong safety culture in the prevention of such errors. The report notes that a safety culture is created through:
When it comes to injury and illness prevention programs, every business is different, and one size certainly does not fit all. Employers who implement injury and illness prevention programs must scale and adapt these elements to meet the needs of their organizations.
Injury and illness prevention programs have been proven to help employers and society reduce the personal, financial and societal costs that injuries, illnesses and fatalities impose. Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of injury and illness prevention programs at both the establishment and corporate levels. This research demonstrates that such programs are effective in transforming workplace culture; leading to reductions in injuries, illnesses and fatalities; lowering workers' compensation and other costs; improving morale and communication; enhancing image and reputation; and improving processes, products and services. The studies also highlight important characteristics of effective programs, including management commitment and leadership, effective employee participation, integration of health and safety with business planning and continuous program evaluation. The authors found that among program participants there was a strong association between improved injury and illness experience and the level of compliance with the program requirements. This is further evidence that programs with strong management commitment and active worker participation are effective in reducing injury risk, while "paper" programs are, not surprisingly, ineffective.
Management leadership in an Injury and Illness Prevention Program means that the business owner or senior management team takes responsibility for the program, soliciting and acting on suggestions, setting goals and monitoring progress, and providing access to needed resources. Strong and visible management leadership is perhaps the most critical element of an effective Injury and Illness Prevention Program. In an evaluation involving over 270 safety and health experts, management leadership and employee involvement consistently ranked as the two most important elements of an Injury and Illness Prevention Program. Research shows that initiatives aimed at increasing management involvement can lead to measurable and dramatic improvements in safety and health activities overall. Management commitment almost always leads to better employee safety and health, less hazardous working conditions, lower workers" compensation and other insurance costs, improved productivity and efficiency, enhanced employee morale, and reduced turnover. Visible management commitment also facilitates more trusting relationships between management and employees. These positive impacts have been widely demonstrated—in organizations ranging in size from the smallest three-person shop to the largest multinational corporation, in industries as diverse as financial services and steel mills, and in work environments with well characterized hazards as well as those confronting newly recognized and emerging hazards. Management leadership starts the organization on the path to superior safety and health performance and reinforces all other elements of an Injury and Illness Prevention Program. This leadership helps set the stage for establishing a strong safety and health "culture" in the organization. Without strong commitment from top management, it is unlikely that the other Injury and Illness Prevention Program elements can operate effectively.
Worker participation, a fundamental element of injury and illness prevention programs, makes an important contribution to an employer's bottom line. When workers are encouraged to offer their ideas and they see their contributions being taken seriously, they tend to be more satisfied and more productive. Engaging employees in dialogue with management and each other about safety and health can lead to improved relationships and better overall communication, along with reduced injury rates. Improved employee morale and satisfaction translates to greater loyalty, lower absenteeism and higher productivity.
Despite the value to employers and workers in terms of injuries prevented and dollars saved, many healthcare institutions have not yet adopted injury and illness prevention programs that unite patient and worker safety. Based on the positive experience of employers with existing programs, we believe that injury and illness prevention programs provide the foundation for breakthrough changes in the way employers identify and control hazards, leading to significantly improved overall workplace health and safety environments. Adoption of injury and illness prevention program will result in both improved patient safety and workers suffering fewer injuries, illnesses and fatalities.
1IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1999. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings (PDF).
*Accessibility Assistance: Contact OSHA's Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management at (202) 693-2300 for assistance accessing PDF materials.
All other documents, that are not PDF materials or formatted for the web, are available as Microsoft Office® formats and videos and are noted accordingly. If additional assistance is needed with reading, reviewing or accessing these documents or any figures and illustrations, please also contact OSHA's Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management at (202) 693-2300.
**eBooks - EPUB is the most common format for e-Books. If you use a Sony Reader, a Nook, or an iPad you can download the EPUB file format. If you use a Kindle, you can download the MOBI file format.Back to Top
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.