1926.550(a)(9)

Cancellation of STD 03-12-002 Uniformity in Interpretation of 29 CFR 1926.550 (a)(9)

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Title:
    Cancellation of STD 03-12-002 Uniformity in Interpretation of 29 CFR 1926.550 (a)(9)
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

This directive is currently only available in: PDF

Uniformity in Interpretation of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9)

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA Instruction STD 3-12.2 October 30, 1978

Jan. 31 1978

OSHA PROGRAM DIRECTIVE #100-75

TO: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS/OSHA

THRU: DONALD E. MACKENZIE Field Coordinator

Subject: Uniformity in Interpretation of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9)

1. Purpose

The purpose of this directive is to assure uniformity within all 10 Regions in the interpretation of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9)

2. Documentation Affected

Barricade in accessible areas of the rear of the rotating structure of the crane secured to the under carriage.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 17, 1980

Mr. Ronald B. Buckhalt
Director of Government Relations
National Utility Contractors Association
815 Fifteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20005

Dear Mr. Buckhalt:

This is in response to your recent inquiry requesting an interpretation and modification of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9) and confirms a telephone conversation with a member of my staff.

Backhoe barricading standards.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 9, 1977

Mr. William G. Wadman
Assistant Executive Director
Associated General Contractors
of Maine, Inc.
P.O. Box N
Augusta, Maine 04330

Dear Mr. Wadman:

This is in response to your letter of June 27, 1977, regarding your request for clarification of backhoe barricading standards. The letter was addressed to our Boston Regional Administrator and forwarded to the National Office for reply. In addition, it confirms a telephone conversation with a member of my staff.

Precautions when barricading of drill and pile rigs is not possible

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

June 3, 1983

Mr. Francis P. Dorcey
The Millgard Corporation
P.O. Box 2248
12822 Stark Road
Livonia, Michigan 48151

Dear Mr. Dorcey:

This is in response to your letter of May 11, 1983, requesting a clarification of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9) as it applies to drilling and pile driving operations.

Necessary precautions required to prevent entry into a swinging superstructure's radius.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 16, 2003

Walter H. West
Safety & Health Systems, Inc.
462 Kingsley Avenue, Suite 201
Orange Park, FL 32073

Re: Whether the swing radius of an excavator has to be barricaded.

Dear Mr. West:

Use of audible alarms in lieu of physical barriers.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 13, 1976

Mr. Robert I. Slaughter
Corporate Safety Supervisor
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
8900 Fairbanks North Houston Road
P.O. Box 40066
Houston, Texas 77040

Dear Mr. Slaughter:

This is in response to your correspondence of June 22, 1976, addressed to Mr. Frank C. Memmott, regarding an alternate to the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(9).

Use of caution tape or rope to barricade a crane's swing radius; guarding of lug connectors on portable welders

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

March 10, 2004

Mr. David A. Touhey, WSO-CST
Safety Specialist
Contractors Risk Management, Inc.
Post Office Box 211
Concord, NH 03302-0211\

Re: Will a caution tape or rope perimeter satisfy the requirement in Subpart N, §1926.550(a)(9), for a barricade around a crane's swing radius? Does OSHA require specific protection for cable terminal connectors on portable welders?

Dear Mr. Touhey:

Request for variance from standard on Cranes and Derricks

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 20, 1991

Ms. Carliss A. Rust
Executive Secretary
Taylor Bros., Inc.
Post Office Box 5165
Evansville, Indiana 47715

Dear Ms. Rust:

This is in response to your letter dated September 13, concerning your request for a variance from Section 1926.550(a)(9) Cranes and Derricks, of the Occupational Safety and Health Regulations for Construction.