Application 1910.212(a)(1) to Sewing Machines in the Light Apparel Manufacturing Industries

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:

OSHA Instruction October 30, 1978 STD 1-12.19

OSHA PROGRAM DIRECTIVE #100-96

TO: REGIONAL ADMISTRATORS/OSHA

THRU: DONALD E. MACKENZIE Field Coordinator

Subject: Application of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1), Ingoing Nip Points, 29 CFR 1910.219(a)(1), General Requirements and 29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3), Vertical and Inclined Belts to Light and Medium Duty Sewing Machines in the Light Apparel Manufac- turing Industries

1. Purpose

Application of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) to Food Waste Disposal Equipment

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:

OSHA Instruction STD 1-12.10 OCT 30, 1978

OSHA PROGRAM DIRECTIVE #100-51

TO: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS/OSHA

Subject: Application of 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1) to Food Waste Disposal Equipment

1. Purpose

To assure uniformity in the application of the subject standard to point of operation guarding on food waste disposal equipment.

2. Directive Affected

None.

3. Background

Kelly Bushings on Oil Well Drilling Rigs

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

February 21, 1980

 

 

Appropriate guarding of lathe chucks.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 26, 1979

Machine guarding for drilling operations.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

March 21, 1990

The Honorable Joseph E. Brennan
Member, United States
  House of Representatives
177 Commercial Street
Portland, Maine 04101

Dear Congressman Brennan:

Thank you for your letter of December 21, 1989, addressed to Ms. Ruth Knight, Director, Office of Intra-Governmental Affairs, concerning a recent inquiry made by your constituent, Mr. Maurice Libner, regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations that pertain to drilling rigs. Please accept my apology for the delay in this response.

Machine Guarding

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

MAR 4 1991

Mr. Jerry Carley
Vice President, Operations
Scotchman Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 850
Philip, South Dakota 57567

Dear Mr. Carley:

Thank you for your inquiry of November 2, 1990, concerning the reissue of a current letter documenting to users of the iron worker machine that if factory installed guards are left in place, or replaced if removed, the machine complies with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards. We apologize for the delay in response.

Acceptable guarding for continuous cycling boneless meat tenderizers.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

November 2, 1987

Mr. J. C. Faucher
President
Lumar Ideal (1981) Inc.
1280 est, rue
Ontario Montreal,
Quebec
H2L 1R6

Dear Mr. Faucher:

This is in response to your letter of September 21, 1987, concerning the boneless meat tenderizers manufactured by your company.

The feasibility of OSHA's machine guarding requirements in their workplace.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 3, 1989

The Honorable Robert H. Michel
Member, United States House of Representatives
100 N.E.
Monroe, Room 107
Peoria, Illinois 61602-1094

Dear Congressman Michel:

Point-of-operation guards for drill presses and lathes.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

October 15, 1990

Mr. Robert Young
Industrial Safety
Group Leader
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Associated Universities, Inc.
Upton,
Long Island, New York 11973

Dear Mr. Young:

This is response to your letter of August 29, regarding point-of-operation guards for drill presses and lathes.