OSHA standards for foot protection.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

December 3, 1985

Mr. David C. Robinson
Midwest Regional Safety Director
Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
C.S.5057
Southfield, Michigan 48037

Dear Mr. Robinson:

This is in response to your letter of July 11, 1985, concerning Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards for foot protection and confirms discussions with Janet Sprickman, a member of my staff.

Wearing of open-toed shoes in an office environment.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 28, 2003

Ms. Heather Siemon
4015 Estermarie Dr., Apt. 43
Cincinnati, OH 45236

Dear Ms. Siemon:

Wearing "Crocs" brand shoes with a partially open heel and a covered toe in a pharmacy setting.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

July 17, 2006

Neelraj Patel
Pharmacist in Charge
4802 Jarboe Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64112

Dear Neelraj Patel:

The use of protective footwear.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 27, 1977

Honorable Richard Bolling
House of Representatives
Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Congressman Bolling:

This is in response to your letter dated April 5, 1977, which transmitted correspondence from your constituent, Mr. Tony Ragan, regarding the use of protective footwear.

Review of a decision in Secretary of Labor v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

May 13, 1977

The Employees
Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.
Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64119

Dear Employees of Churchill Truck Lines:

Steel-toed Safety Shoes for Diabetics

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

June 29, 2012

Mr. Kenneth Ray Douglas
2707 Timber Drive
Dickinson, Texas 77539

Dear Mr. Douglas:

Personal Protective Equipment Standard for General Industry; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of the Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    74:61175-61176
  • Title:
[Federal Register: November 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 224)][Notices]               [Page 61175-61176]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23no09-91]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No.