The correct testing procedure for tree-trimming saddle belts

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

May 7, 1982

Ms. Sandra B. Kloster
Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy
Attorney at Law
111 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 400
San Jose, California 95113

Dear Ms. Kloster:

This is in response to your letter of April 19, 1982, concerning the correct testing Procedure for tree-trimming saddle belts.

The approval and use of "PRO-TEK-TO" safety toe caps.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

December 10, 1979

Mr. V. R. Wallace
525 Hibiscus Blvd.
Merritt Island, Florida 32952

Dear Mr. Wallace:

This is in response to your recent inquiry regarding the approval and use of "PRO-TEK-TO" safety toe caps. We apologize for the delay in response.

The OSHA standard 29 CFR 1910.132(a), (copy enclosed), outlines the general requirements for protection of extremities. However, it is the employer's responsibility to determine the particular type of personal protective footwear needed.

The employer shall make the appropriate safety footwear available.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 29, 1982

Sharp knives and utensils in the workplace

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

December 10, 1991

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Grassley:

Thank you for your letter of September 19, regarding concerns raised by your constituent, Mr. Gregory Ramsell, about Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Mr. Ramsell works as a dishwasher and asserts the need for regulations covering sharp knives and utensils because he is injured often.

Personal protective equipment, general requirements and employer responsibility.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 20, 1993

Jerry Zebor
Senior Safety Engineer
Johnson Controls
World Services, Inc.
Bangor Support Project J-80
Naval Submarine Base Bangor
Silverdale, WA 98315

Dear Mr. Zebor:

This is in response to your letters of May 26, June 4, and July 28 requesting an interpretation of the 29 CFR 1910.132(a) (Personal Protective Equipment, General Requirements), phrase "...shall be provided...". Please accept our apologies for the delayed response.

The use of a crane near overhead power lines.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

November 1, 1993

Mr. Howard Schaffner
Hofeld and Schaffner
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3120
Chicago, IL 60602

Dear Mr. Schaffner:

This is in response to your October 5 letter requesting interpretations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards concerning the use of a crane near overhead power lines.

Exemption from wearing hard hats.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 26, 1994

Charan Singh Kalsi
Secretary & Public Relation Officer
Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Inc.
541 Prospect Street
Glen Rock, New Jersey 07452

Dear Charan Singh Kalsi:

This is in further response to your letter of November 18, 1993, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in which you requested information regarding the exemption from wearing hard hats.

Requirements for emergency eyewash stations in retail autoparts stores

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 11, 1994

Mr. John Raiford, CSP, ARM
Assistant Vice President
Risk Control Manager
Sedgwick James of Tennessee, Inc.
5350 Poplar Avenue
Memphis, Tennessee 38119

Dear Mr. Raiford:

Thank you for your inquiry of January 28, addressed to our Nashville, Tennessee, office, requesting an interpretation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements for emergency eyewash stations in retail autoparts stores. Your letter was transferred to us for action, and we apologize for the delay in responding.

Landscaping employees working in extreme temperatures

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

July 14, 1992

Mr. Joseph Peake
REG #51547-080
P.O. Box 700
Yankton, South Dakota 57078

Dear Mr. Peake:

This is in response to your letter of June 14, requesting information covering Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards applicable to landscaping employees working in extreme temperatures.

Clarification on standards for head protection.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 23, 1983

Honorable Norman Sisisky
Member, United States
House of Representatives
Virginia First Savings and
Loan Building
Room 607
Franklin and Adams Street
Petersburg, Virginia 23803

Dear Congressman Sisisky:

This is in response to your letter of July 29, 1983, on behalf of Mr. Buddy R. Lipes, concerning OSHA's regulations for the wearing of hard hats.