Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Numbers Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    87:21926-21928
  • Title:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21926-21928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Numbers Under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act

AGENCY: Occupational

Ionizing Radiation Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    85:38931-38932
  • Title:
    Ionizing Radiation Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements 
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38931-38932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No.

OSHA/NRC Interface Activities and Related Information

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 15, 1985

 

 

Review of permissible radiation exposure levels

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

November 5, 1985

Mrs. Linda Haney
RD 2 - Box 105
Middlebury Center, Pennsylvania 16931

Dear Mrs. Haney:

This is in response to your letter of October 11, regarding permissible radiation exposure levels. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) standard for ionizing radiation can be found in 29 CFR 1910.1096, copy enclosed.

Clarification of the jurisdiction's of OSHA and the NRC in nuclear power plants

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 8, 1987

Mr. John A. Corder
Route 4 Box 4158
Brazoria, Texas 77422

Dear Mr. Corder:

Your letter dated December 10, 1986, addressed to the Secretary of Labor, regarding means of egress and exposure to ionizing radiation in a nuclear power plant and design, installation, and maintenance discrepancies within the plant has been forwarded to me for response.

Definition of an airborne radioactivity area

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

October 6, 1992

Mr. Richard A. Schreiber
Georgia Radon Program
DHR Environmental Health
878 Peachtree Street, NE - Room 100
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3917

Dear Mr. Schreiber:

We regret the delay in responding to your letter of March 19, to Ms. Cynthia Wolff, Atlanta Regional Office, requesting clarification of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Ionizing Radiation Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1096.

The Ionizing Radiation Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1096.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 16, 1989

 

 

Ionizing radiation hazards in the workplace

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 27, 1990

Mr. James W. Krueger President
American Association of Radon Scientists
and Technologists, Inc.
Post Office Box 70
Park Ridge, New Jersey 07656

Dear Mr. Krueger:

This is in response to your letter of July 24 to Mr. David M. Smith of my staff concerning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard 29 CFR 1910.1096 Ionizing radiation.

Definition of Reasonable Diligence as stated in 1910.1096(d)(1).

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 17, 1991

The Honorable John McCain
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator McCain:

This is in further response to your letter of February 11, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) concerning radon.