Contractors and the criteria for applying the Construction Work Standard.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

February 1, 1996

Mr. Joe O'Connor
INTEC
1 Endicott Avenue
Johnson City, New York 13790

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

This is in response to your letter of May 19, 1995 concerning contractors and the criteria for applying the 29 CFR 1910.12(b) standard. Please accept our apology for the delay in this response.

Cross-view back-up mirrors on delivery trucks

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 24, 1997

The Honorable Maurice D. Hinchey
291 Wall Street
Kingston, New York 12401

Dear Congressman Hinchey:

This is in response to your inquiry of November 22, on behalf of Ms. Gladys Vaughn, concerning regulations addressing "cross-view" back-up mirrors on delivery trucks. Ms. Vaughn lost a five year old nephew when he was struck by a local delivery truck that was backing up.

Fall Protection requirements in the Construction Standard.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 16, 1997

Susan R. Geier
Corporate Safety and Health Consultants, Inc.
125 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10083

Dear Ms. Geier:

Clarification on the documentation of inspections and tests required under the mechanical integrity provisions.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 16, 1996

Mr. Sylvester W. Fretwell
Director of Safety
Lever Brothers Company
818 Sylvan Avenue
Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Dear Mr. Sylvester:

The acceptability of manhole entries through concentric cone or eccentric cone concrete pipe transition sections to underground workplaces.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

May 13, 1986

Mr. Glen N. Felton
Kawanihae Concrete
P.O. Box 4950
Kawanihae, Hawaii 96743

Dear Mr. Felton:

This is in response to your letter of April 21, 1986, in which you request guidance concerning the acceptability of manhole entries through concentric cone or eccentric cone concrete pipe transition sections to underground workplaces.

As you may not be aware, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not have standards under which eccentric cones are required. Local jurisdictions may have such requirements.

Use of electronic signature pad to record signatures for training certification.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 10, 2000

Robert W. Champion, Jr.
Occupational Safety and Health Specialist
Belvidere Assembly Plant
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
3000 W. Chrysler Drive
Belvidere, Illinois 61998

Dear Mr. Champion:

Thank you for your February 4, 2000 letter concerning the use of a electronic signature pad to record signatures for training classes and computer driven training. We apologize for the delay in responding.

Regulations for machine shop and press room safety.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 11, 1984

Mr. Anthony Ambrose, Jr.
67 N. Transithill Drive
Depew, New York 14043

Dear Mr. Ambrose:

This is in response to your letter of September 4, 1984, in which you request information about OSHA regulations for machine shop and press room safety.

Securing a personal fall arrest lanyard to a portable hook ladder as a safety measure

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

 

 

June 4, 1991

 

 

 

 

Unique, Drilling Rig-Doghouses, Oil and Gas Drilling Industries.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

November 6, 1980

Request for OSHA's approval of a specific Commercial Scuba Diver Training and Certification program denied

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

FEB 1 1991

The Honorable Al Swift Member,
United States House of Representatives
308 Federal Building
Bellingham, Washington 98225

Dear Congressman Swift:

Thank you for your letter of December 3, 1990 concerning a request for assistance from Mr. Thomas E. Hemphill. Mr. Hemphill desires a review and approval of his course outline for Commercial Scuba Diver Training and Certification. We previously responded directly to Mr. Hemphill on November 26, 1990 in response to his letter of November 16, 1990. A copy of the response is enclosed.