Powered by GoogleTranslate

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 306798869 - Apache Stainless Equipment Corp

Inspection Information - Office: Appleton Area Office

 

Inspection Nr: 306798869
Report ID: 0521100
Date Opened: 03/08/2005

Site Address:
Apache Stainless Equipment Corp
2910 Apache Dr.
Plover, WI 54467

Mailing Address:
, , 00000

Union Status: NonUnion

SIC:3443

NAICS: 332420/Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing


Inspection Type: Accident

Scope: Partial

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Safety

Close Conference: 07/22/2005

Emphasis:

Case Closed: 10/19/2005


Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Accident 100650597
Complaint 204846562 Yes
Referral 200651263 Yes
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 2 2
Current Violations 2 2
Initial Penalty $5,625 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,625
Current Penalty $2,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001A Serious 5A0001 07/28/2005 08/30/2005 $1,600 $4,000 $0 I - Informal Settlement  
2. 01001B Serious 19100147 C06 I 07/28/2005 08/30/2005 $0 $0 $0 I - Informal Settlement Citation has been deleted.
3. 01001C Serious 19100147 D 07/28/2005 08/01/2005 $0 $0 $0 I - Informal Settlement Citation has been deleted.
4. 01002 Serious 19101030 C01 I 07/28/2005 08/30/2005 $650 $1,625 $0 I - Informal Settlement  

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 200651024
Event: 03/04/2005
Employee Is Injured When Struck by Blanking Plate

On March 4, 2005, Employee #1 (leadman) was performing a hydrostatic pressure test on a large stainless steel pressure vessel at a plant which manufactures pressure vessels. The tank was cylindrical, about 14 in. diameter and 24 in. long. The tank was pressurized to 150 number for the test. Upon successful completion of the test, he was draining the water from the tank. He soon discovered that the water would not drain very quickly, as the internal configuration of the tank was such that a vacuum was being created here were inadequate air openings to displace the draining water. After consultation with the plant supervisor and plant manager, it was decided that compressed air would be pumped into the tank to force the water out for a short time, then more openings would be exposed and the water could drain by itself. The110 number air was pumped into the tank by Employee #1 and supervisor, and the water began draining. The supervisor turned the job back to Employee #1. Sometime later, the air hose was disconnected, and the compressed air was also allowed to bleed off. About an hour after the draining began, Employee #1 ordered another coworker to close the drain valve. Employee #1 then went to the area of the drain valve and is presumed to have begun to remove the quick-closure clamps used to seal a tank portal several inches higher than the drain. Normally, the water would be pumped from an opening near, but above the drain when the water levels had dropped to near the drain level. This employee apparently had seen air bubbling out in the drain line and assumed (correctly) that the water level had dropped to near the drain level. The air pressure, however, had not completely off, and when the clamp was loosened, it flew off at him accompanied by a massive air pressure release. Employee #1 received head and neck injuries when being struck by the blanking plate and when his head was snapped back from the release. Employee #1 was paralyzed in the hospital for several days before he died of respiratory and other complications. The employee and the supervisor were very experienced at hydrostatic pressure testing, but pneumatic pressure testing was extremely rare at the plant. They had never had to pump in air to drain a tank before. The company had procedures for both hydrostatic and pneumatic tests, and each employee was trained several years earlier on these procedures. Several days earlier, an attempt to fill the tank with water for the test was unsuccessful, as the same lack of tank openings near the top of the tank would not allow for this to be filled. An extra hole was drilled to allow for filling. Quick-closure clamps are very rarely used during these tests, but the type of clamp used for the test is dependent on the type of clamp that will be used once the tank is put into production. A witness said that the employee was hurried during the draining process. It was Friday, and the tank needed to be shipped on Monday, and there was more work to be done on the tank. He was also working on another tank nearby. The tank had two pressure gauges mounted at the high point of the tank, these both should have read water and air pressure as well. Both were working before and after the test. The gauges were on the same line as was used to force compressed air into the tank. To read these gauges, the worker would have to walk to the end of the tank away from the drain and climb up a shortstepladder. There was no procedure or training for doing the work in this particular manner. How long to pump in the air, what steps were needed to ensure that the pressure was dissipated, what measures were needed to avoid reintroduction of pressure or how safely release the pressure was not specified? The normal hydrostatic test calls for the employee to make sure that the pressure is at zero before opening the tank. In a normal hydrostatic test, the tank pressure would drop to zero very shortly after the tank draining began. Because air was used, t

Keywords: AIR PRESSURE, HEAD, DRAIN PIPE, FALL, NECK, STRUCK BY, TANK, HAND, LEG

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree of Injury Nature of Injury Occupation
1 306798869 Fatality Concussion Supervisors, production occupations
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close