Powered by GoogleTranslate

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 125497438 - Killarney Construction Co., Inc.

Inspection Information - Office: San Francisco District Office

 

Inspection Nr: 125497438
Report ID: 0950611
Date Opened: 10/19/2000

Site Address:
Killarney Construction Co., Inc.
75 Louis Lane
San Francisco, CA 94134

Mailing Address:
358 - 12th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103

Union Status: NonUnion

SIC:1522

NAICS: 0 


Inspection Type: Accident

Scope: Complete

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Safety

Close Conference: 11/21/2000

Planning Guide: Safety-Construction

Emphasis:

Case Closed: 01/26/2001


Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Accident 362190720
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 1 1
Current Violations 1 1
Initial Penalty $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100
Current Penalty $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001 Other 342 A 12/12/2000 12/15/2000 $100 $100 $0 -  

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 170205181
Event: 10/20/1998
Employee injured in fall from roof

At approximately 2:30 p.m. on October 20, 1998, Employee #1, a carpenter for Killarney Construction, was nailing plywood on a pitched roof. The employer had built platforms from which to work, and the foreman said he instructed Employee #1 just that day to use them. Instead, Employee #1 decided to go outside on the pitched roof. He was standing behind a plywood sheet, pushing it into place, when the board slipped down and knocked him off his feet. Employee #1 fell between 25 and 30 ft, sustaining injuries that required hospitalization. None of his eight coworkers saw the fall. Prior to the accident, Employee #1 had used a platform for four similar jobs without any complaints. A safety meeting had been held two days prior to the accident. According to the foreman, Employee #1 should have known to work from the platforms because he had been instructed to do so and because he had seen coworkers on the platforms at pervious jobs. It appears that this accident was the result of an employee-independent act. It could have been prevented if Employee #1 worked as instructed, i.e., from the platform instead of the roof.

Keywords: INSTALLING, ROOF, CARPENTER, WORK RULES, CONSTRUCTION, FALL, FALL PROTECTION, WORK PLATFORM, SLOPE

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree of Injury Nature of Injury Occupation
1 125497438 Hospitalized injury Fracture Carpenters
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close