Inspection Detail
Inspection: 314573478 - Victor Vallejo Dba Vallejo And Sons Painting
Inspection Information - Office: Sacramento District Office
Site Address:
Victor Vallejo Dba Vallejo And Sons Painting
1120 Kirkwood Meadows Dr
Kirkwood, CA 95646
Mailing Address:
803 Hazel Dr, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Union Status: NonUnion
SIC:1761
NAICS: 238160/Roofing Contractors
Inspection Type: Accident
Scope: Partial
Advanced Notice: N
Ownership: Private
Safety/Health: Safety
Close Conference: 02/22/2012
Planning Guide: Safety-Construction
Emphasis: S:Construction (Cship)
Case Closed: 01/30/2014
Type | Activity Nr | Safety | Health |
---|---|---|---|
Accident | 361685118 |
Violations/Penalties | Serious | Willful | Repeat | Other | Unclass | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Violations | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Current Violations | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Initial Penalty | $13,500 | $0 | $0 | $350 | $0 | $13,850 |
Current Penalty | $8,000 | $0 | $0 | $150 | $0 | $8,150 |
FTA Penalty | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
# | Citation ID | Citaton Type | Standard Cited | Issuance Date | Abatement Due Date | Current Penalty | Initial Penalty | FTA Penalty | Contest | Latest Event | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 01001 | Other | 1509 A | 02/23/2012 | 02/28/2012 | $75 | $175 | $0 | 03/14/2012 | F - Formal Settlement | |
2. | 01002 | Other | 1509 B | 02/23/2012 | 02/28/2012 | $75 | $175 | $0 | 03/14/2012 | F - Formal Settlement | |
3. | 02001 | Serious | 1670 A | 02/23/2012 | 02/28/2012 | $8,000 | $13,500 | $0 | 03/14/2012 | F - Formal Settlement |
Investigation Summary
At approximately 10:00 a.m. on August 26, 2011, Employee #1 was working as a painter at a multi-story condominium building. Employee #1 and his coworkers had been working at the site for 3-4 weeks. The employer had rigged a horizontal lifeline system at the beginning of the project, and had provided all employees with body harnesses. This lifeline system was rigged along the ridge of the building. The system was not engineered and the equipment consisted largely of climbing gear, rather than approved fall protection devices. However, the system appeared to be well laid out and erected in accordance with good climbing practices and in a manner capable of withstanding the intended load. Earlier that day, the employer had conducted a safety meeting, where he specifically warned Employee #1 to wear and attach the harness to the lifeline. The employer left the worksite, and Employee #1 and all coworkers who were working on the roof at that time were tied off. Later that morning, Employee #1 was wearing his harness and lanyard but he was not attached to the lifeline. Employee #1 slipped and fell approximately 36 feet to the ground below. Employee #1 sustained severe head injuries and was unable to recall most details prior to and following the accident. Employee #1 did remember wearing the climbing gear and having been attached to the anchor point at some time. He is also an experienced climber and believed the equipment and system to be an acceptable safety measure.
Keywords: HEAD, ROOF, FALL, FALL PROTECTION, CONCUSSION, PAINTER
# | Inspection | Age | Sex | Degree of Injury | Nature of Injury | Occupation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 314573478 | Hospitalized injury | Other | Painters, construction and maintenance |