Powered by GoogleTranslate

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 314573478 - Victor Vallejo Dba Vallejo And Sons Painting

Inspection Information - Office: Sacramento District Office

 

Inspection Nr: 314573478
Report ID: 0950621
Date Opened: 10/04/2011

Site Address:
Victor Vallejo Dba Vallejo And Sons Painting
1120 Kirkwood Meadows Dr
Kirkwood, CA 95646

Mailing Address:
803 Hazel Dr, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150

Union Status: NonUnion

SIC:1761

NAICS: 238160/Roofing Contractors


Inspection Type: Accident

Scope: Partial

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Safety

Close Conference: 02/22/2012

Planning Guide: Safety-Construction

Emphasis: S:Construction (Cship)

Case Closed: 01/30/2014


Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Accident 361685118
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 1 2 3
Current Violations 1 2 3
Initial Penalty $13,500 $0 $0 $350 $0 $13,850
Current Penalty $8,000 $0 $0 $150 $0 $8,150
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001 Other 1509 A 02/23/2012 02/28/2012 $75 $175 $0 03/14/2012 F - Formal Settlement  
2. 01002 Other 1509 B 02/23/2012 02/28/2012 $75 $175 $0 03/14/2012 F - Formal Settlement  
3. 02001 Serious 1670 A 02/23/2012 02/28/2012 $8,000 $13,500 $0 03/14/2012 F - Formal Settlement  

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 202492591
Event: 08/26/2011
Employee Is Injured in Fall from Roof

At approximately 10:00 a.m. on August 26, 2011, Employee #1 was working as a painter at a multi-story condominium building. Employee #1 and his coworkers had been working at the site for 3-4 weeks. The employer had rigged a horizontal lifeline system at the beginning of the project, and had provided all employees with body harnesses. This lifeline system was rigged along the ridge of the building. The system was not engineered and the equipment consisted largely of climbing gear, rather than approved fall protection devices. However, the system appeared to be well laid out and erected in accordance with good climbing practices and in a manner capable of withstanding the intended load. Earlier that day, the employer had conducted a safety meeting, where he specifically warned Employee #1 to wear and attach the harness to the lifeline. The employer left the worksite, and Employee #1 and all coworkers who were working on the roof at that time were tied off. Later that morning, Employee #1 was wearing his harness and lanyard but he was not attached to the lifeline. Employee #1 slipped and fell approximately 36 feet to the ground below. Employee #1 sustained severe head injuries and was unable to recall most details prior to and following the accident. Employee #1 did remember wearing the climbing gear and having been attached to the anchor point at some time. He is also an experienced climber and believed the equipment and system to be an acceptable safety measure.

Keywords: HEAD, ROOF, FALL, FALL PROTECTION, CONCUSSION, PAINTER

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree of Injury Nature of Injury Occupation
1 314573478 Hospitalized injury Other Painters, construction and maintenance
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close