Powered by GoogleTranslate

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 300059490 - Camaco Columbus Manufacturing

Inspection Information - Office: Omaha Area Office

 

Inspection Nr: 300059490
Report ID: 0728900
Date Opened: 08/02/2000

Site Address:
Camaco Columbus Manufacturing
1851 E 32nd Ave
Columbus, NE 68601

Mailing Address:
Po Box 879, Columbus, NE 68601

Union Status: NonUnion

SIC:3714

NAICS: 0 


Inspection Type: Complaint

Scope: Partial

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Safety

Close Conference: 08/04/2000

Planning Guide: Safety-Manufacturing

Emphasis: S:Amputations

Case Closed: 10/17/2000


Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Complaint 202767562 Yes
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 4 4
Current Violations 3 3
Initial Penalty $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000
Current Penalty $6,525 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,525
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001 Serious 19100212 A03 II 09/05/2000 09/22/2000 $2,700 $4,500 $0 I - Informal Settlement  
2. 01002A Serious 19100217 C02 IA 09/05/2000 09/22/2000 $2,700 $4,500 $0 I - Informal Settlement  
3. 01002B Serious 19100217 C02 ID 09/05/2000 09/22/2000 $0 $0 $0 -  
4. 01002C Serious 19100217 C03 III 09/05/2000 09/22/2000 $0 $0 $0 -  
5. 01003 Serious 19100219 F03 09/05/2000 09/22/2000 $1,125 $1,875 $0 I - Informal Settlement  
6. 01004 Serious 19100255 B05 09/05/2000 09/08/2000 $1,125 $1,125 $0 I - Informal Settlement Citation has been deleted.

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 200050995
Event: 07/24/2000
Employee's hand injured when caught in power press

Employee #1 and a coworker were operating a Cleveland part-revolution power press. They were running the 110 ton press in the dual operator mode, where there are two separate sets of controls. To initiate a cycle, both operators must activate their two-hand controls simultaneously. Employee #1 and the coworker completed a cycle and the coworker moved forward to remove a completed part from the left side of the die when the brake mechanism of the press failed. He realized the press was coming down and moved his hand away from the danger area. Employee #1 was also reaching into the machine when the die lowered on his right hand with enough force that he could not remove it from between the upper and lower dies. The coworker notified a supervisor of the accident and contacted a maintenance person who was in the area. The maintenance person had other employees block the press so that the die could not move down any further. The maintenance person then reversed the power to the press motor so that it would cycle in the opposite direction. He then actuated the press in the "inch" mode so that he could control its movement. The maintenance worker was able to move the press ram upwards and free Employee #1's hand. He suffered numerous small lacerations and severe bruising, but doctors predicted a complete recovery within two weeks. Subsequent inspection of the press revealed that all safety devices were operating correctly. The brake mechanism is actuated pneumatically and springs keep the brake in contact with the brake plate until air is injected into the brake piston. This causes the brake/clutch plate to move into contact with the flywheel, cycling the press. In the event the air pressure is too low to move the brake piston, the press will not cycle. The press is designed so that a power or air failure will not cause it to cycle erratically. In this case, the O-ring which maintains pressure in the brake cylinder had disintegrated and become trapped in the piston sleeve. This caused the brake/clutch plate to jam between the flywheel and the brake pads, leaving the machine stuck in a state of limbo. There was no power transfer to the press so it did not cycle, nor was there any pressure against the brake pads to stop the press from rolling over, thus allowing the press to close. This is not something that can be routinely inspected. To examine the O-ring that failed takes a maintenance worker between 10 and 12 hours. The press had been inspected by a qualified maintenance worker within 42 hours before the accident, and no deficiencies were noted.

Keywords: POWER PRESS, EQUIPMENT FAILURE, TWO-HAND CONTROL, CAUGHT BETWEEN, POINT OF OPERATION, PRESS OPERATOR, HAND, PRESS, CONTUSION

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree of Injury Nature of Injury Occupation
1 300059490 Non Hospitalized injury Bruise/Contus/Abras Occupation not reported
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close