Translate
Inspection Detail
Inspection: 1516816.015 - Hayward Hills Operating Company Lp
Inspection Information - Office: Oakland District Office
Site Address:
Hayward Hills Operating Company Lp
1768 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
Mailing Address:
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA 95814
Union Status: NonUnion
SIC:
NAICS: 623110/Nursing Care Facilities
Inspection Type: Accident
Scope: Partial
Advanced Notice: N
Ownership: Private
Safety/Health: Health
Close Conference: 08/18/2021
Emphasis:
Case Closed: 10/18/2024
| Type | Activity Nr | Safety | Health |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accident | 1738585 |
| Violations/Penalties | Serious | Willful | Repeat | Other | Unclass | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Violations | 9 | 9 | ||||
| Current Violations | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Initial Penalty | $0 | $0 | $0 | $8,405 | $0 | $8,405 |
| Current Penalty | $0 | $0 | $0 | $5,555 | $0 | $5,555 |
| FTA Penalty | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| # | Citation ID | Citaton Type | Standard Cited | Issuance Date | Abatement Due Date | Current Penalty | Initial Penalty | FTA Penalty | Contest | Latest Event | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 01001 | Other | 5162(D) | 08/19/2021 | 09/23/2021 | $975 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | |
| 2. | 01002 | Other | 5194(E)(1) | 08/19/2021 | 09/23/2021 | $605 | $605 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | |
| 3. | 01003 | Other | 5199(C) | 08/19/2021 | $3,000 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | ||
| 4. | 01004 | Other | 5199(C)(2) | 08/19/2021 | $0 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | Citation has been deleted. | |
| 5. | 01005 | Other | 5199(C)(3) | 08/19/2021 | $0 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | Citation has been deleted. | |
| 6. | 01006 | Other | 5199(C)(4) | 08/19/2021 | $0 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | Citation has been deleted. | |
| 7. | 01007 | Other | 5199(C)(5) | 08/19/2021 | $0 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | Citation has been deleted. | |
| 8. | 01008 | Other | 5199(C)(6) | 08/19/2021 | $0 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order | Citation has been deleted. | |
| 9. | 01009 | Other | 5199(C)(7) | 08/19/2021 | $975 | $975 | $0 | 02/27/2022 | O - Administrative Law Judge Order |
Investigation Summary
At 8:00 p.m. on December 11, 2020, an employee who had been working as a Receptionist was hospitalized due to COVID-19. The employee worked at a licensed skilled nursing facility that employs 80 staff including Registered Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Receptionists, Housekeepers and others. In late November and all through December of 2020 there was an outbreak of COVID-19 at the facility. From November 28 to December 28, 21 coworkers tested positive. On November 28, 2020 "Patient 0", an asymptomatic dialysis patient, took a COVID-19 test which was positive. Additional testing was conducted, and on December 7, 2020, two coworkers tested positive for COVID-19, triggering outbreak requirements including segregation of patients into "green," "yellow," and "red" zones, for non-COVID-19 patients, patients who did not have a recent negative test, and COVID-19 cases, respectively. During this time the employee was tasked with screening employees for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. The employee performed this work wearing a fit-tested BYD N95 Respirator. While working on December 7, 2020, she took a COVID-19 test which was negative. She continued to work to the end of her shift on December 9, 2020, and after returning home began to feel feverish. She called in sick the following day, and was hospitalized on December 11, 2020, when she tested positive for COVID-19. The employee stated that she did not enter patient care areas, took her lunch in an isolated office or in the break room, but only if no one else was present. Through an exposure evaluation the employer identified 3 coworkers who may have had close contact with the employee during her high-risk exposure period. One employee ate lunch in the same room but stayed at least 6 feet apart at a different table. The other 2 potential close contacts were ruled out due to the use of respiratory protection at the time of contact. Adequate Aerosol Transmissible Diseases policies and procedures were not in place.
Keywords: Infectious Disease
| # | Inspection | Age | Sex | Degree of Injury | Nature of Injury | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1516816.015 | 58 | F | Hospitalized injury | Administrative support occupations, n.e.c. |