Powered by GoogleTranslate

Inspection Detail

Inspection: 125999391 - Amerifloor Technical

Inspection Information - Office: San Diego District Office

 

Inspection Nr: 125999391
Report ID: 0950632
Date Opened: 06/09/1999

Site Address:
Amerifloor Technical
8880 Rehco Rd
San Diego, CA 92121

Mailing Address:
7888 Silverton Ave #D, San Diego, CA 92126

Union Status: NonUnion

SIC:1752

NAICS: 238330/Flooring Contractors


Inspection Type: Accident

Scope: Complete

Advanced Notice: N

Ownership: Private

Safety/Health: Health

Close Conference: 12/06/1999

Emphasis:

Case Closed: 03/16/2010


Related Activity
Type Activity Nr Safety Health
Accident 361640642
Violation Summary
Violations/Penalties Serious Willful Repeat Other Unclass Total
Initial Violations 10 5 15
Current Violations 8 3 11
Initial Penalty $18,000 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $20,500
Current Penalty $13,500 $0 $0 $1,500 $0 $15,000
FTA Penalty $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Violation Items
# Citation ID Citaton Type Standard Cited Issuance Date Abatement Due Date Current Penalty Initial Penalty FTA Penalty Contest Latest Event Note
1. 01001 Serious 1509 A 12/03/1999 01/05/2000 $1,500 $500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
2. 01002 Other 1510 C 12/06/1999 01/08/2000 $0 $500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement Citation has been deleted.
3. 01003 Other 1511 B 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $0 $500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement Citation has been deleted.
4. 01004 Other 5144 F01 12/06/1999 01/08/2000 $500 $500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
5. 01005 Other 5144 G 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $0 $500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement Citation has been deleted.
6. 02001 Serious 1534 A 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $3,000 $3,000 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
7. 03001 Serious 1534 B 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $3,000 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
8. 04001 Serious 1935 C 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
9. 05001 Other 1513 E 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
10. 06001 Serious 1514 C 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
11. 07001 Serious 1522 A 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
12. 08001 Other 1528 A 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
13. 09001 Serious 1528 B 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
14. 10001 Serious 5144 A 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $1,500 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement  
15. 11001 Serious 1530 A02 12/06/1999 12/16/1999 $0 $1,500 $0 02/02/2000 F - Formal Settlement Citation has been deleted.

Investigation Summary

Investigation Nr: 201062593
Event: 06/08/1999
Three employees injured when vapors ignited

Three employees of a polymeric floor coating application contractor were seriously burned while using an electric floor buffer. The employees were using a methyl ethyl ketone solvent to strip an uncured floor when the vapors from the solvent ignited from a spark from the floor buffer. All three employees were working inside a small bathroom, approximately 1,000 cubic ft, when the fire occurred. Employee #1 was operating a floor buffer with brush attachment. The buffer was a Waxie Model 17, a 17-in. electric floor buffer with a 1-horse power, 120-volt electrical motor. The motor was an induction motor, but started with a centrifugal switch that is capable of sparking. Employee #1 was operating the floor buffer, while Employee #2 and Employee #3 poured the solvent onto the floor and then wiped behind the buffer with rags. Employee #1 suffered severe second-and-third-degree burns to 20 percent of his body. Employees #2 and #3 suffered similar injuries over a smaller percent of their body. The accident occurred at a customer's premises, during working hours. The fire caused significant damage to the bathroom, detaching a locked door and separating it from the door frame. The three employees were wearing half-mask respirators with an inappropriate cartridge, short-sleeve shirts, latex exam gloves and the only source of ventilation was from a ceiling fan rated at 6 to 9 air changes per hour. The employer had no safety plan for performing the floor stripping operation and did not bring portable ventilation to the site. When the employee's eyes became irritated, they donned swimming goggles purchased from a sporting goods store in the vicinity and continued to work until the fire occurred.

Keywords: BURN, MEK, VAPOR, VENTILATION, PPE, FIRE, SPARK

Investigated Inspection
# Inspection Age Sex Degree of Injury Nature of Injury Occupation
1 125999391 Hospitalized injury Burn/Scald(Heat) Construction trades, n.e.c.
2 125999391 Hospitalized injury Burn/Scald(Heat) Construction trades, n.e.c.
3 125999391 Hospitalized injury Burn/Scald(Heat) Construction trades, n.e.c.
Back to Top

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close