Inspection Detail
Inspection: 106186190 - Turriff Construction Co.
Inspection Information - Office: Manhattan Area Office
Site Address:
Turriff Construction Co.
208 Hull Street
Brooklyn, NY 11233
Mailing Address:
52-12 Church Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203
Union Status: NonUnion
SIC:1761
NAICS: 0
Inspection Type: Referral
Scope: Complete
Advanced Notice: N
Ownership: Private
Safety/Health: Safety
Close Conference: 05/27/1992
Planning Guide: Safety-Construction
Emphasis: L:Gutreh
Case Closed: 12/27/2000
| Type | Activity Nr | Safety | Health |
|---|---|---|---|
| Referral | 901521302 | Yes |
| Violations/Penalties | Serious | Willful | Repeat | Other | Unclass | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Violations | 8 | 8 | ||||
| Current Violations | 8 | 8 | ||||
| Initial Penalty | $9,300 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $9,300 |
| Current Penalty | $9,300 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $9,300 |
| FTA Penalty | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| # | Citation ID | Citaton Type | Standard Cited | Issuance Date | Abatement Due Date | Current Penalty | Initial Penalty | FTA Penalty | Contest | Latest Event | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 01001 | Serious | 19260020 B02 | 09/16/1992 | 10/16/1992 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $0 | - | ||
| 2. | 01002 | Serious | 19260021 B02 | 09/16/1992 | 10/19/1992 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $0 | - | ||
| 3. | 01003 | Serious | 19260150 A01 | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $750 | $750 | $0 | - | ||
| 4. | 01004 | Serious | 19260500 B02 | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $750 | $750 | $0 | - | ||
| 5. | 01005 | Serious | 19260500 B08 | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $750 | $750 | $0 | - | ||
| 6. | 01006 | Serious | 19260500 D01 | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $0 | - | ||
| 7. | 01007 | Serious | 19260850 G | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $1,500 | $1,500 | $0 | - | ||
| 8. | 01008 | Serious | 19261052 B01 | 09/16/1992 | 09/21/1992 | $1,050 | $1,050 | $0 | - |
Investigation Summary
EMPLOYEES #1 AND #2 WERE WORKING ON THE ROOF OF A THREE-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING THAT HAD BEEN SUBJECTED TO A FIRE AND WAS UNDERGOING RENOVATION AND REHABILITATION. BOTH MEN WERE PUTTING A WEATHERPROOF COVER OVER THE CORNICE (A DECORATIVE COPPER SHEET THAT LOOKS LIKE A PARAPET ON THE EDGE OF THE BUILDING). EMPLOYEES #1 AND #2 WERE TO CONSTRUCT A WOOD AND TARPAPER COVER WHICH WOULD SLANT FROM THE TOP OF THE CORNICE TO THE PLANE OF THE EXISTING ROOF. WHILE EMPLOYEE #1 HELD A PIECE OF WOOD IN PLACE ON THE CORNICE FOR EMPLOYEE #2 TO NAIL, THE CORNICE GAVE WAY AND EMPLOYEE #1 FELL. EMPLOYEE #2 TRIED TO CATCH HIM AND HE FELL ALSO. IT IS BELIEVED THAT EMPLOYEE #1 PUT TOO MUCH OF HIS WEIGHT ON THE CORNICE WHILE HOLDING THE WOOD. THE CORNICE COULD NOT SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF A MAN AND WAS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO ACT AS FALL PROTECTION EVEN IF IT HAD BEEN OF AN ADEQUATE HEIGHT. NO FALL PROTECTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THESE TWO MEN.
Keywords: ROOF, WORK RULES, CONSTRUCTION, FALL, FALL PROTECTION
| # | Inspection | Age | Sex | Degree of Injury | Nature of Injury | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 106186190 | Hospitalized injury | Other | Occupation not reported | ||
| 2 | 106186190 | Hospitalized injury | Other | Occupation not reported |
Translate