Federal Agency Targeting Inspection Program (FEDTARG10)

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

This directive is currently only available in:            PDF




FAA Airport Traffic Control Tower Monitoring Program (AIRTRAF)

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

This directive is currently only available in:          PDF

Federal Agency Targeting Inspection Program (FEDTARG 09)

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

This directive is currently only available in:          PDF

OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA INSTRUCTION

 

DIRECTIVE NUMBER: CSP [03-02-002] EFFECTIVE DATE: 2/10/05
SUBJECT: OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health

 

Field Federal Safety and Health Council Operations Manual

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
OSHA INSTRUCTION

Letter to DASHOS regarding reprisals.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

June 5, 1987

The Honorable Henry Kuualoha
Giugni Sergeant at Arms
Room S321
The Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Mr. Giugni:

Since the issuance of Executive Order 12196, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Federal agencies have been concerned with the issue of reprisal and how to provide adequate protection for Federal employees when they exercise their rights provided under the Executive Order and 29 CFR Part 1960, Basic Program Elements for Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health Programs.

Federal employees' rights and reprisal protection in relation to filing safety and health complaints.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

January 18, 1985

Honorable Charles E. Bennett
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Bennett:

This is in response to your letter of November 24, on behalf of your constituent, Mr. J.T. Adams. Mr. Adams was concerned about reprisals after filing safety complaints with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). He was also concerned about alleged unsafe working conditions at the U.S. Postal Service in Jacksonville, Florida.

Using 1992 data to "program" inspections.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

May 29, 1997

Jim Dykes, CSP
Corporate Director of Safety
Interstate Brands Corporation
3049 Tamarak Drive
Manhattan, Kansas 66502

Dear Mr. Dykes:

This is in further response to your letter of December 28, 1996, to me regarding using 1992 data to "program" inspections. I apologize for the delay in responding.