Requirements for precast concrete.
- Part Number:
- Part Number Title:
- Title:
- GPO Source:
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
April 17, 1986
John Rosenthal, P.E.
Vice President Operations
ALUMA-SYSTEMS
4800 Dufferin Street
Doomsview (Toronto), Ontario, Canada M3H 559
Dear Mr. Rosenthal:
This is in response to your letter of March 10 requesting guidance on the spacing of guardrail brackets used on flying forms.
The post spacing of guardrail brackets (post sockets) at 14-foot intervals would be permissible if the guardrail system provides the equivalent protection of a spacing of 8-feet.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
November 25, 1991
Mr. Chris A. Geckler
Texstar Construction Corp.
1334 N. W. White Road
San Antonio, Texas 78219
Dear Mr. Geckler:
This is in response to your letter of August 23 requesting information on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) requirements addressing lift-slab bridge construction. We apologize for the delay in responding to your inquiry.
Abstract: This rule corrects a technical error in OSHA's final rule for Concrete and Masonry Construction located in subpart Q of 29 CFR 1926. 704(b). That final rule was published in the Fed. Reg. on June 16, 1988 (53 FR 22612) and was subsequently incorrectly published in the 1988 edition of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Both the Federal Register and the CFR contain the error. Both documents contain the word "should" in 1926.704(b) instead of the word "shall".
Abstract: Extension of comment period and connection of proposed rule for concrete and masonry construction that was published in 50 FR 373543, dated 9/16/85. Comments deadline: December 16, 1985.
Abstract: Schedules an informal public hearing on the proposed revised standard on Concrete and Masonry Construction (50 FR 37543, September 16, 1985). 1926.707(a)(1) is a new regulation which requires that masonry walls be laterally supported to resist horizontal forces where such walls are incapable of withstanding the forces that will be applied to them. Notices of intention to appear to give oral testimony at the informal public hearing must be postmarked by May 6, 1986.
Abstract: Announces changes in the starting date of public hearing, the location of the hearing, the date for submission of comments, notices of intention to appear, and other documentary evidence on the proposed revision of the safety standards for Concrete and Masonry Construction (51 FR 11945, April 8, 1986) due to schedule conflicts of several witnesses. Notices of intention to appear to give oral testimony at the informal public hearing must be postmarked by May 20, 1986.
Abstract: This rule revises OSHA's safety standards for Concrete and Masonry Construction (formerly Concrete, Concrete Forms, and Shoring) located in Subpart Q of 29 CFR Part 1926. The rule corrects problems related to the existing regulation, including ambiguities, redundancies, and gaps in coverage.