Occupational Exposure to Beryllium and Beryllium Compounds in Construction and Shipyard Sectors; Proposed Rule

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    84:53902-53954
  • Title:
    Occupational Exposure to Beryllium and Beryllium Compounds in Construction and Shipyard Sectors; Proposed Rule 
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53902-53954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21038]



Vol. 84

Tuesday,

No.
Federal Program Change Summary Reports:

Final Rule for Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica

Federal CFR:
FR Standard Date: 03/25/2016
Adoption Required - Yes
Intention Required - Yes

Cancellation of CPL 03-00-007, National Emphasis Program - Crystalline Silica

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA NOTICE

DIRECTIVE NUMBER: CPL 03-00-007 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26, 2017
SUBJECT: Cancellation of CPL 03-00-007, National Emphasis Program - Crystalline Silica

ABSTRACT

Purpose:
This Notice cancels OSHA Instruction CPL 03-00-007, National Emphasis P

National Emphasis Program – Crystalline Silica

  • Record Type:
  • Current Directive Number:
  • Old Directive Number:
  • Title:
  • Information Date:
Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

This is an OSHA ARCHIVE Document, and may no longer represents OSHA policy. This document is presented here in PDF as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

 

 

Special emphasis program for silicosis.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

March 27, 1998

The Honorable Virgil H. Goode
U. S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515-4605

Dear Congressman Goode:

Thank you for your correspondence of October 27, 1997, requesting information on the status of the Special Emphasis Program (SEP) for Silicosis. Please accept my apology for the delay in this response.

Whether it is mandatory to use a wet saw when cutting brick or concrete block.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

July 20, 2006

Maria Galvan
[by e-mail]

Re: Whether it is mandatory to use a wet saw when cutting brick or concrete block.

Dear Ms. Galvan:

This is in response to your email correspondence dated June 15, 2005, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). We apologize for the long delay in responding.

We have paraphrased your question as follows:

Question: Do OSHA requirements mandate the use of a wet saw to cut bricks and cement blocks?

Building and Construction Trades Department - 04/06/2007

 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
TRADES DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO,
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, and
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD
OF TEAMSTERS,

Petitioners,

v.