Hearing Conservation Program
- Record Type:
- Current Directive Number:
- Old Directive Number:
- Title:
- Information Date:
OSHA INSTRUCTION
| DIRECTIVE NUMBER: PER 04-00-004 | EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/23/2008 |
| SUBJECT: Hearing Conservation Program | |
ABSTRACT
| DIRECTIVE NUMBER: PER 04-00-004 | EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/23/2008 |
| SUBJECT: Hearing Conservation Program | |
ABSTRACT
This directive is currently only available in: PDF

| DIRECTIVE NUMBER: CPL 2-2.54A | EFFECTIVE DATE: July 14, 2000 |
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
October 24, 2013
Marc Garland, CSP
Safety Director
Precision Environmental Co.
5500 Old Brecksville Road
Independence, OH 44131
Dear Mr. Garland,
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 1111-1144] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 04-28221] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Part V Department of Labor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Occupational Safety and Health Administration ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, and 1926 Standards Improvement Project-
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
September 23, 1983
MEMORANDUM FOR: GERALD P. REIDY
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JOHN B. MILES JR., DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF FIELD COORDINATION
SUBJECT: [Company name withheld]
This is in response to your memorandum of August 26, 1983, concerning an employee of [company name withheld] who requested copies of his medical records pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.[1020].
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
August 28, 1992
The Honorable Michael R. McNulty
Member, United States House of Representatives
U.S. Post Office
29 Jay Street
Schenectady, New York 12305
Dear Congressman McNulty:
This is in response to your letter of July 24, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), written on behalf of your constituent Mr. Robert J. Stein, Jr., of Delmar, New York. Mr Stein wrote to you concerning his inability to obtain a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for a product to which he was exposed in 1989.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
July 31, 1989
Dr. Lynn A. Corson
Civil Engineering Building
Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Dear Dr. Corson:
This is in response to your letter of May 5, regarding the relationship between the Hazard Communication (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200, and Access to Employee Medical Records, 29 CFR 1910.1020, as they relate to maintenance of material safety data sheets (MSDS) and the written hazard communication program.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
July 31, 1989
Mr. Charles E. Lindsay
Lindsay Hardwoods, Incorporated
Post Office Box 343
Highway 15 and 460 West
Farmville, Virginia 23901
Dear Mr. Lindsay:
This is in response to your correspondence of May 2, regarding SARA Title III reporting requirements under sections 311, 312 and 313.