Variances and other relief under section 6(d).
- Part Number:
- Part Number Title:
- Title:
- GPO Source:
Variance Regulations; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
- Publication Date:
- Publication Type:
- Fed Register #:83:13790-13792
- Title:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 13790-13792] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2018-06525] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No.
Required Frequency of Periodic Wire Rope Inspections for Lifting Equipment
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
February 5, 1992
Mr. J. R. Pizzano
Project Manager, Reactor Services Project
Newport News Shipbuilding
4101 Washington Avenue
Newport News, Virginia 23607
Dear Mr. Pizzano:
This correspondence is in response to your letter dated June 18, 1991, which requested an interpretation of the standards addressing the required frequency of periodic wire rope inspections for lifting equipment. Please excuse our delay in responding to your inquiry.
Variance Informational Handout.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
June 16, 1993
Conveyor Crossover Stile.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
April 22, 1996
Mr. Bruce Whitman
Manager, Product Safety
Rapistan Demag Corporation
507 Plymouth Avenue, N.E.
Grand Rapids, MI 49505-6098
Dear Mr. Whitman:
This is in response to your letter of February 29, in which you asked for a letter of exemption from OSHA reg 1910.27 for your conveyor crossover stile. You were concerned because one of your customers was cited by an OSHA inspector in Indiana for violation of this standard while utilizing your product.
Boat captain be considered the employer of divers if the captian had the power to exercise control over the divers.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
April 12, 1994
The Honorable William S. Cohen
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Senator Cohen:
This is in further response to your January 3rd letter regarding the applicability of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's commercial diving standard to the sea harvest industry. This response also provides amplification to the letter sent to you on February 7th by Mr. John B. Miles, Jr., OSHA Regional Administrator, Region I.
Comments on Variance Application Number 2293.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
September 18, 1995
MEMORANDUM FOR: STEVE MALLINGER
Acting Director
Directorate of Technical Support
FROM: JOHN MILES
Director
Directorate of Compliance
SUBJECT: Comments on Variance Application Number 2293: VARIANCE
REQUEST FROM 1910.179(n)(3)(vi), 1910.180(h)(3)(vi),
and 1910.180(h)(4)(ii)
This memorandum is in response to your request for assistance in evaluating a variance request for Lockheed Martin Astro Space.
Review of Variance Request Number 2276
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
May 30, 1995
.dl-horizontal dt{text-align:left;}
- MEMORANDUM FOR:
- CHARLES E. ADKINS, DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT - FROM:
- JOHN B. MILES, JR., DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS - SUBJECT:
- Review of Variance Request Number 2276
Request for a permanent variance and interim order.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
May 25, 1995
Mr. William J. Gibson
Manager, Regulatory Compliance
James River Pennington, Inc.
Naheola Mill HC 66
Box 315
Pennington, Alabama 36916
Dear Mr. Gibson:
This is in response to your letter of May 11, addressed to Mr. Joseph A. Dear, Assistant Secretary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) concerning your request for a permanent variance and interim order from 29 CFR 1910.261(g)(17)(i). Your letter was forwarded to the Directorate of Technical Support for a response.
Request for a permanent variance and an interim order regarding pressure vessel safety valve configuration.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
May 25, 1995
Mr. Dana A. Smith
Manager, Safety and Health
Rayonier - Jesup Mill
Post Office Box 2070
Jesup, Georgia 31545
Dear Mr. Smith:
This in response to letter of May 9, addressed to the Assistant Secretary of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), concerning your request for a permanent variance and an interim order from 29 CFR 1910.261(g)(17)(i) regarding pressure vessel safety valve configuration. Your request was forwarded to the Directorate of Technical Support for a response.