Clarification on the use of a rigid boot as a precautionary measure

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

November 28, 2017

Mr. Raymond J. Skwarek
UCOR, URS / CH2M, Oak Ridge LLC
P.O. Box 4699
Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Dear Mr. Skwarek:

Thank you for your letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regarding 29 CFR Part 1904 - Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Your letter requests clarification of OSHA's injury and illness recordkeeping requirements in reference to the use of a rigid boot as a precautionary measure.

Determining if the employees experienced an injury or illness due to an exposure.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 14, 2017

Nichole Winnett
Jackson Lewis P. C.
10701 Parkridge Blvd.
Suite 300
Reston, VA 20191

Dear Ms. Winnett:

Thank you for your letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regarding the requirements contained in 29 CFR Part 1904 - Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Your letter requests interpretation of an incident involving a work-related exposure to 15% hydrofluoric acid.

National Association of Manufacturers - 11/16/2001

Settlement Agreement

United States District Court for the District of Columbia

National Association of Manufacturers, Plaintiff, v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, and John Henshaw, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, Defendants.

[Case No: 1:01CV00575 (GK)]

Revised Settlement Agreement