Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.1200(f); 1910.1200(d)(2)|
January 20, 1987
Mr. D. S. Richardson
2655 Harland Drive
Hudson, Ohio 44236
Dear Mr. Richardson:
This is in response to your letter of December 13, 1986, requesting clarification of the terms "appropriate hazard warning" and "mandatory" as used in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard.
Concerning "appropriate hazard warning," OSHA's guidelines to its compliance staff on the Hazard Communication Standard OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.38A Change 1, page A-11, enclosed states that the specific hazards indicated in the standards definition for "physical" and "health" hazards must be used in evaluating the appropriateness of specific warnings. In the example you presented, if the only scientific information available is the LC(50) of 5 milligrams per kilogram administered orally to rats, "highly toxic if ingested" may be the appropriate warning. If the chemical causes specific target organ effects when ingested, then the specific target organ effects would be appropriate.
As stated in Appendix B of the Hazard Communication Standard, the hazard determination is performance-oriented and relies heavily on the professional judgment of the evaluator. Nevertheless, the hazard determination must examine all relevant data and produce a scientifically defensible evaluation. The results of any studies which are designed and conducted according to established scientific principles must be reported if statistically significant health effects are found. If these statistically significant health effects are known to the target organ level, then these health effects would be "appropriate."
If only general health effects are known, then it would be "appropriate" to list these on the label.
The Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(2) states, "Appendix A shall be consulted for the scope of health hazards covered." The term "mandatory" refers to the requirement to consult Appendix A for the scope of health hazards.
Please feel free to contact us, if further assistance is needed.
John A. Pendergrass
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.