Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.126(e)|
November 9, 1983
Robert H. Elliott, Jr.
6027 Cannon Hill Road
Fort Washington, PA 19034
Dear Mr. Elliott:
This letter was prepared in response to your written inquiry (copy attached of October 28, 1983 regarding cyanide electroplating baths. You questioned the need for diking around the tank in cases where there are dual concentric tanks; i.e., a tank within a tank. In the latter case leakage of cyanide from the inner tank would appear in a sight glass in the outer tank and/or sound an alarm at some predetermined level of leakage. You also questioned whether it is necessary to separate rinse streams.
As you are aware, the hazard from cyanide is primarily toxicity and not fire or explosion for which regulation by the Flammable and Combustible Liquid standard, 29 CFR 1910.106, is intended. Diking or drainage requirements pertain to this standard.
It appears, therefore, that your approach to handling tank cyanide leakage is satisfactory to OSHA. Also, we have no requirement for separating rinse streams. If you have additional questions please contact the Technical Support Group of this office.
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health.
LINDA R. ANKU
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.