Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
| Standard Number:||1910.95(d)|
August 15, 1983
Mr. A. Stuart Heggie
Donley, Miller & Nowikas, Inc.
56 State Highway 10 East
Hanover, New Jersey 07936
Dear Mr. Heggie:
This is in response to a recent telephone conversation you had with MaryAnn Garrahan of my staff and John Barry of OSHA's Philadelphia Regional Office. You requested further clarification concerning our July 26, 1983, letter to you which discusses monitoring procedures for determining employee noise exposure in the workplace.
The requirement for monitoring noise exposure is a performance requirement. Although a technical violation may exist, we do not contemplate issuing a citation under the monitoring provisions of the noise standard (29 CFR 1910.95(d)) when OSHA samples for noise exposure and finds:
1. Everyone who should be is included in the hearing conservation program;
2. Proper hearing protectors are provided; and
3. The employer has a noise monitoring program.
As you are aware, this letter is not intended to give approval or disapproval to the long term averaging technique used by your firm.
We appreciate the opportunity to address your concern.
John B. Miles, Jr.
Office of Field Coordination
|Standard Interpretations - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.