Federal Registers - Table of Contents|
| Publication Date:||06/17/1999|
| Publication Type:||Notice|
| Fed Register #:||64:32447-32449|
| Standard Number:||1910; 1911|
| Title:||Occupational Exposure to Tuberculosis.|
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
29 CFR Part 1910
[Docket No. H-371]
Occupational Exposure to Tuberculosis
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of limited reopening of rulemaking record.
SUMMARY: On October 17, 1997, OSHA published its proposed standard to regulate occupational exposure to tuberculosis (TB). Public hearings on the proposal were held in Washington, DC, Los Angeles, CA, New York City, NY, and Chicago, IL between April 7 and June 4, 1998. The post- hearing comment period closed on October 5, 1998. OSHA is now reopening the rulemaking record for 45 days to submit two reports to the docket: OSHA's report on TB control practices in homeless shelter settings (Ex. 179-1); and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) of a medical waste treatment facility (Ex. 179-2). OSHA invites public comment on the findings of these reports and the underlying issues of the coverage of homeless shelters and medical waste treatment facilities within the scope of a final TB standard. OSHA also seeks comment on including TB and AIDS clinics and probation and parole officers within the scope of the standard as well as expanding the coverage of the standard to include all social service workers.
In addition, OSHA is submitting to the docket four other documents, previously unavailable, that relate to issues addressed during the public hearings. These documents are: The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's (ACOEM) "Guidelines for Protecting Health Care Workers Against Tuberculosis" (Ex. 179-3); "Laboratory Performance Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators, 1996" (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, December 11, 1998) (Ex. 179-4); "The Costs of Healthcare Worker Respiratory Protection and Fit-Testing Programs" by Scott E. Kellerman et al. (September 1998, Journal of Infection Control and Epidemiology) (Ex. 179-5); and "The Relative Efficacy of Respirators and Room Ventilation in Preventing Occupational Tuberculosis" by Kevin Fennelly and Edward Nardell (October 1998, Journal of Infection Control and Epidemiology)(Ex. 179-6). Public comment on these documents is also invited. Comments should be limited to the issues raised in these documents, and participants do not need to resubmit evidence or comments that are already in the record.
DATES: Comments must be postmarked no later than August 2, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Send two copies of your comments to: Docket Office, Docket H-371, Room N2625, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210. Comments limited to 10 pages or fewer may also be transmitted by FAX to: 202-693-1648, provided that the original and one copy of the comment are sent to the Docket Office immediately thereafter.
Comments may also be submitted electronically through OSHA's Internet site at URL, http://www.osha.gov/e-comments/e-comments-tb.html. Information such as studies and journal articles cannot be attached to electronic submissions and must be submitted in duplicate to the above address. Such attachments must clearly identify the respondent's electronic submission by name, date, and subject, so that they can be attached to the correct submission.
The entire record for the TB rulemaking, including the new reports being submitted, is available for inspection and copying in the Docket Office, Docket H-371, telephone 202-693-2350.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bonnie Friedman, Office of Information and Consumer Affairs, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210, Telephone (202) 693-1999, FAX (202) 693-1634.
On August 25, 1993, the Labor Coalition to Fight TB in the Workplace petitioned OSHA to initiate rulemaking for a permanent standard issued under Section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act to protect workers from occupational exposure to TB. Citing the recent resurgence of TB and the emergence of new cases of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), the petitioners stressed the need for a substance-specific standard to address the particular hazards associated with occupational exposures to TB. The petitioners contended that the non-mandatory TB Guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) do not provide adequate protection because they are not fully or rigorously implemented in most workplaces.
On October 17, 1997, OSHA published its proposed standard for occupational exposure to TB (62 FR 54160). Based on a review of the data, OSHA made a preliminary determination that workers in hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, correctional facilities, homeless shelters, and certain other work settings are at significant risk of incurring TB infection while caring for their patients and clients or performing certain procedures. To reduce this occupational risk, OSHA proposed a standard that would require employers to protect TB-exposed workers by means of infection prevention and control measures that have been demonstrated to be highly effective in reducing or eliminating job- related TB infections. These measures include procedures for the early identification of individuals with suspected or confirmed infectious TB, the isolation of such individuals in rooms designed to protect those in the vicinity of the room from contact with microorganisms causing TB, the use of respirators when performing certain high-hazard procedures, employee training, employee skin testing and, where appropriate, medical management and follow-up after an exposure incident or skin test conversion has occurred.
Throughout the development of the proposal, OSHA has been concerned about the feasibility of implementing a TB standard in homeless shelters because of the unique characteristics of the workforce in such shelters, the unique characteristics of the client population, and the non-profit nature of most homeless shelters. Prior to publication of the proposal, OSHA held stakeholder meetings with homeless shelter representatives and met with the Interagency Council on the Homeless to discuss issues related to the potential impact the standard might have on homeless shelters. In addition, during review under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), small business representatives from the homeless shelter sector raised specific concerns about many shelters' ability to implement certain provisions of OSHA's proposed standard. To address issues related to the feasibility of the proposed standard for homeless shelters, OSHA requested information in the proposal and held special sessions at each hearing site to receive testimony from employers, employees, clients and others representing homeless shelters. In addition, OSHA initiated a study to examine these issues further through an on-site survey of a number of homeless shelters. The results of this study (Ex. 179-1) did not become available to OSHA until after the close of the public comment period. This study has now been placed in the docket for this rulemaking and is available for public comment.
Waste Treatment Facilities
During the development of the proposal, OSHA was also concerned about additional types of work settings that might need to be included within the scope of the TB standard because they pose a significant risk of occupational TB exposure to their employees. During the public hearings, testimony was submitted that addressed the potential for significant occupational exposure to TB at medical waste treatment facilities handling medical wastes that had not been decontaminated. Preliminary findings from investigations at a medical waste treatment facility where a TB outbreak had occurred were presented at the hearings and used as supplemental evidence to support the inclusion of medical waste treatment facilities within the scope of the standard. Other commenters suggested that instead of including the waste treatment facilities, laboratories covered under the TB standard should be required to decontaminate their TB wastes prior to sending them offsite for disposal. At the time of the public hearings on the TB rule, NIOSH was in the process of conducting a Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) to evaluate the potential for occupational exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis during the processing the medical wastes. The final HHE (Ex. 179-2) was completed after the close of the public comment period, and has now been entered into the docket for public comment.
Other Work Settings
In addition to homeless shelters and medical waste treatment facilities, other work settings were also recommended by various commenters for possible inclusion in the final standard. Several commenters urged OSHA to cover TB and AIDS clinics based on the fact that these types of clinics are likely to have a high percentage of clients at risk for having infectious TB. OSHA is considering including these ambulatory clinics within the scope of the final standard and seeks additional information on whether such inclusion is warranted. In particular, OSHA solicits information on the number of such clinics, the number of employees typically employed by these clinics, and data on the risk of TB to employees of these facilities.
Commenters also urged the Agency to include parole and probation officers within the scope of the final standard. These commenters testified during the public hearings that parole and probation officers must often interact with the same type of high-risk populations as employees in correctional facilities and therefore, they should be included within the scope of the final standard. Therefore, OSHA also solicits additional information on whether the inclusion of parole and probation officers under the final standard is warranted.
Finally, commenters urged the Agency to expand the standard's coverage of social service workers to include all social service workers and not just social service workers providing services to individuals who are in TB isolation or who are otherwise segregated or isolated due to having infectious TB. OSHA solicits information on whether expanding coverage to all social service workers is warranted. In particular, OSHA is concerned about the feasibility of including such a broad spectrum of workers in the final standard. Thus, the Agency is interested in ways to determine the type(s) of social service workers who may reasonably be anticipated to incur occupational exposure to TB and types of provisions that would be most effective to reduce TB risks of such employees.
Additional Submissions to the Record
In addition, four other documents pertinent to issues raised during the rulemaking became available after the close of the rulemaking record. These documents are: (1) the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's (ACOEM) "Guidelines for Protecting Health Care Workers Against Tuberculosis" (Ex. 179-3); (2) "Laboratory Performance Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators, 1996" (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, December 11, 1998) (Ex. 179-4); (3) "The Costs of Healthcare Worker Respiratory Protection and Fit-Testing Programs" by Scott E. Kellerman et al. (September 1998, Journal of Infection Control and Epidemiology) (Ex. 179-5) and (4) "The Relative Efficacy of Respirators and Room Ventilation in Preventing Occupational Tuberculosis" by Kevin Fennelly and Edward Nardell (October 1998, Journal of Infection Control and Epidemiology) (Ex. 179-6).
Reopening of the Record and Request for Comments
In order to complete the rulemaking record on issues related to the feasibility of the proposed standard for homeless shelters and medical waste treatment facilities, OSHA is now reopening the rulemaking record and placing in the record the final homeless shelter study, "Final Report on Site Visits to Nine Homeless Shelters", (Ex. 179-1) and the NIOSH medical waste facility HHE(Ex. 179-2). OSHA is also submitting four additional documents, listed above, which include three articles related to respiratory protection issues discussed during the hearings and one article by the ACOEM outlining recommendations for controlling the transmission of TB. These exhibits are available in the Docket Office at the address listed above.
OSHA seeks public comment on (1) the homeless shelter report, (2) the NIOSH HHE, and (3) the underlying issues related to the feasibility of the proposed standard for homeless shelters, and whether the standard should cover medical waste treatment facilities, to help OSHA determine whether and, if so, how homeless shelters and medical waste treatment facilities should be regulated under the final TB standard. Comments are also requested on whether OSHA should require laboratories to decontaminate medical wastes containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis before these wastes are sent offsite for disposal. In addition, new information on including TB and AIDS clinics as well as social service workers and parole and probation officers within the scope of a final standard is sought.
OSHA also requests comment on four additional documents: the ACOEM TB guidelines and three articles addressing respiratory protection against TB, which are listed above. In particular, the Agency is interested in comments regarding the adequacy of qualitative fit-testing for N95 respirators for determining a face-seal leakage of no greater than 10 percent.
This document was prepared under the direction of Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.
It is issued under section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-90 (55 FR 9033) and 29 CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of June, 1999.
Charles N. Jeffress,
Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 99-15240 Filed 6-16-99; 8:45 am]
|Federal Registers - Table of Contents|
The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.