Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100095 D01 Occupational noise exposure.
Inspection Nr: 1429631.015
Citation: 01002
Citation Type: Other
Abatement Date: 03/31/2020 2
Initial Penalty: $10,603.00
Current Penalty: $9,967.00
Issuance Date: 02/20/2020
Nr Instances: 1
Nr Exposed: 4
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity:
Report ID: 0728500
Contest Date:
Final Order: 03/16/2020
Emphasis:
Substance: 8110
Substance: 8111
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 03/16/2020 | $9,967.00 | 03/31/2020 | Other | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 02/20/2020 | $10,603.00 | 03/17/2020 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: At a facility located at 150 Royal Oak Dr., Branson, MO: The employer is failing to protect employees from occupational noise hazards. This was most recently demonstrated on or about September 9, 2019 when: 1) An employee in the bag area/performing bagging work was exposed to a dose of 176.8% or an equivalent of 94.1 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program. 2) An employee in the bag room area/performing bagging work was exposed to a dose of 113.3% or an equivalent of 90.9 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program. 3) An employee in the burn room area/performing burner work was exposed to a dose of 107.3% or an equivalent of 90.5 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program. 4) An employee in the press room area/performing press operator work was exposed to a dose of 95.4% or an equivalent of 89.6 decibels as an 8-hour time weighted average and the employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program.