Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Violation Items

Nr: 106559685 Citation: 01001D Issuance: 12/30/1997 ReportingID: 0524530

Viol Type:Serious NrInstances:9 Contest Date:01/26/1998
Abatement Date:01/05/1998 X Nr Exposed:5 Final Order:02/15/1999
Initial Penalty: REC: Emphasis:
Current Penalty: Gravity:10 Haz Category:BURNS

Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Event Date Penalty Abatement Type FTA Insp
Penalty Z: Issued 12/30/1997 01/05/1998 Serious  
Penalty F: Formal Settlement 02/15/1999 01/05/1998 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 001D Hazard: BURNS

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the ignition of pyrotechnic shells: At the fireworks barge #D930687, on or about 07-03-97, five employees were exposed to the hazards of being burned due to the unexpected detonation of eight-inch pyrotechnic shells from improperly separated mortars of comparable size. One employee was using a road flare to manually discharge shells from mortars contained in three plastic 55-gallon drums. Each drum possessed a 22-inch diameter and contained three mortars apiece. Seven eight- inch mortars and two ten-inch mortars were held in the upright position by the three plastic 55-gallon drums. These mortar tubes were not separated from the drum walls by a minimum of five inches. The hazards of mortar displacement and lack of protection to guard against a premature shell detonation inside the tube existed. One method of abatement to correct these apparent hazards is to arrange the individual mortar tubes so that they are separated from the drum walls by a minimum of five inches as required by NFPA 1123, paragraph 2- DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ***THIS ITEM REQUIRES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT***

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.