Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100119 E03 IV Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.
This violation item has been deleted.
Inspection Nr: 312412356
Citation: 03009D
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Date: 06/03/2010
Initial Penalty:
Current Penalty:
Issuance Date: 04/28/2010
Nr Instances: 5
Nr Exposed: 24
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity:
Report ID: 0854910
Contest Date: 05/27/2010
Final Order: 10/23/2013
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 10/23/2013 | 06/03/2010 | Serious | ||
Penalty | Z: Issued | 04/28/2010 | 06/03/2010 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 03 Item/Group: 009D Hazard: REFINERY
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv) The process hazard analysis shall address: Consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls; A. The employer did not ensure that the process hazard analysis (PHA) addressed consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This violation was identified during inspections of the facility from November 2009 to March 2010, Silver Eagle Refining Inc., 2355 South 1100 West, Woods Cross, UT, 84087. During review of the #1 Crude Unit PHA (undated), documentation provided by the employer did not demonstrate that engineering and administrative controls were addressed and/or the failure of such controls. The employer provided unrestricted access to the complete original copy of the #1 Crude Unit PHA. By not addressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls, the employer did not fully evaluate all potential hazards present in the operating unit. Such oversight can expose employees to serious injury or death in the event of an incident. This may be a system-wide occurrence that requires evaluation of all PHA's for all covered processes. B. The employer did not ensure that the process hazard analysis (PHA) addressed consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This violation was identified during inspections of the facility from November 2009 to March 2010, Silver Eagle Refining Inc., 2355 South 1100 West, Woods Cross, UT, 84087. During review of the #2 Crude Unit PHA, dated 5/11/05, documentation provided by the employer did not demonstrate that engineering and administrative controls were addressed and/or the failure of such controls. The employer provided unrestricted access to the complete original copy of the #2 Crude Unit PHA. By not addressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls, the employer did not fully evaluate all potential hazards present in the operating unit. Such oversight can expose employees to serious injury or death in the event of an incident. This may be a system-wide occurrence that requires evaluation of all PHA's for all covered processes. C. The employer did not ensure that the process hazard analysis (PHA) addressed consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This violation was identified during inspections of the facility from November 2009 to March 2010, Silver Eagle Refining Inc., 2355 South 1100 West, Woods Cross, UT, 84087. During review of the 2009 MDDW PHA, dated 6/3/09 to 8/5/09, documentation provided by the employer did not demonstrate that engineering and administrative controls were addressed and/or the failure of such controls. The employer provided unrestricted access to the complete original copy of the 2009 MDDW PHA. By not addressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls, the employer did not fully evaluate all potential hazards present in the operating unit. Such oversight can expose employees to serious injury or death in the event of an incident. This may be a system-wide occurrence that requires evaluation of all PHA's for all covered processes. D. The employer did not ensure that the process hazard analysis (PHA) addressed consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This violation was identified during inspections of the facility from November 2009 to March 2010, Silver Eagle Refining Inc., 2355 South 1100 West, Woods Cross, UT, 84087. During review of the Naphtha HDS PHA, dated June 18, 2008, documentation provided by the employer did not demonstrate that engineering and administrative controls were addressed and/or the failure of such controls. The employer provided unrestricted access to the complete original copy of the Naphtha HDS PHA. By notaddressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls, the employer did not fully evaluate all potential hazards present in the operating unit. Such oversight can expose employees to serious injury or death in the event of an incident. This may be a system-wide occurrence that requires evaluation of all PHA's for all covered processes. E. The employer did not ensure that the process hazard analysis (PHA) addressed consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls. This violation was identified during inspections of the facility from November 2009 to March 2010, Silver Eagle Refining Inc., 2355 South 1100 West, Woods Cross, UT, 84087. During review of the Naphtha HDS PHA, 2009 MDDW PHA, #2 Crude Unit PHA, and the #1 Crude Unit PHA conducted by Silver Eagle, PHA's did not address consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls due to seismic events. As identified in the 2006 revision of the facility response plan, MDDW 1- UOSH-50, "the site could be subject to an earthquake." By not addressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls, the employer did not fully evaluate all potential hazards present in the operating unit. Such oversight can expose employees to serious injury or death in the event of an incident. This may be a system-wide occurrence that requires evaluation of all PHA's for all covered processes.