Translate
Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100212 A01 General requirements for all machines.
Inspection Nr: 1003600.015
Citation: 02008
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $6,300.00
Current Penalty: $4,095.00
Issuance Date: 03/27/2015
Nr Instances: 13
Nr Exposed: 11
Abatement Date: 11/13/2015
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0112000
Contest Date:
Final Order: 04/27/2015
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 04/27/2015 | $4,095.00 | 11/13/2015 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 03/27/2015 | $6,300.00 | 05/13/2015 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 02 Item/Group: 008 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by rotating parts and flying chips: A. Bullard Area: On, or about, October 24, 2014, the shield provided around Bullard VTL 0013 was approximately 35 inches above the work platform on which the operator stood. The shield should have been at least 42 inches above the work platform. B. Tool Room: On, or about, November 19, 2014, the following Okuma horizontal lathes were not provided with chuck guards: M23, M24 and M25. C. Turning Cell: On, or about, November 14, 2014, the door interlock switches provided on Machine # 4391 and Machine #4392, two Mori Seiki SL-65 turning centers, had been bypassed. The door key had been removed from the access door and inserted into the key receiver. D. Football Field: 1. On, or about, January 8, 2015, the YCM M100 turning center was not provided with an interlock on the access door during the automatic cycle and the auger-type chip conveyor was not safeguarded either by the use of a constant pressure control, door interlock or physical barrier guards. 2. On, or about, November 14, 2014, the door interlock switches provided on Machines M18 and M19, two Mori Seiki Model SL-65 Turning Centers, had been bypassed. 3. On, or about, January 8, 2015, Machine M56, a Supermax V2110B turning center was not provided with an interlock on the access door during the automatic cycle and the auger-type chip conveyor was not safeguarded either by the use of a constant pressure control, door interlock or physical barrier guard. 4. On, or about, January 8, 2015, the door interlock switches provided on Machine M87 and Machine M88, two Puma 450 turning centers, had been bypassed. E. Back Tool Room Area: On, or about, November 19, 2014, the door interlock switch provided on Monarch VMC 175B milling center had been bypassed.