Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 19260501 B11 Duty to have fall protection.

Inspection Nr: 1789145.015

Citation: 02003

Citation Type: Willful

Abatement Status: Not Completed - Worksite Changed

Initial Penalty: $33,103.00

Current Penalty: $5,000.00

Issuance Date: 05/09/2025

Nr Instances: 2

Nr Exposed: 3

Abatement Date: 06/27/2025

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0112000

Contest Date: 06/20/2025

Final Order: 07/08/2025

Related Event Code (REC): C;I

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty F: Formal Settlement 07/08/2025 $5,000.00 06/27/2025 Willful  
Penalty C: Contested 06/23/2025 $33,103.00 06/27/2025 Willful  
Penalty Z: Issued 05/09/2025 $33,103.00 06/27/2025 Willful  

Text For Citation: 02 Item/Group: 003 Hazard:

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): The employer does not ensure that each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels are not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): The employer fails to assure effective protections against fall hazards for employees working on a multi-pitch roof six feet or more above a lower level as required by the standard, as demonstrated at the Burnham Library Roof Replacement Project on November 20, 2024 and December 6, 2024. Instance #1: On November 20, 2024 employees were observed working over 17 feet above a lower level on an eight-pitch slate roof without the use of fall protection. Instance #2: On December 6, 2024 employees were observed working over eight feet above a lower level on a six-pitch asphalt shingled roof covered in snow without the use of fall protection. A Notice of Imminent Danger was posted on the rungs of the ladder used to access the scaffold by the CSHO due to the ongoing fall protection hazard, but was removed by an unknown party prior to the hazard being corrected. Stephen Pomazi Inc. was previously inspected and cited in 2014 under almost identical circumstances. OSHA Inspection 978877, Citation 1-3a: 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7). Stephen Pomazi was cited for not erecting, moving, or altering a scaffold under the direction and supervision of a competent person. He showed an intentional disregard for the requirements of the OSH Act and a plain indifference to employee safety and health in that employees were exposed to the same hazards under almost identical conditions on November 20, 2024. In both instances, employees were working at heights without fall protection and using improperly constructed scaffolding among other apparent violations.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close