New Wincup Holdings, Inc. | Occupational Safety and Health Administration osha.gov

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 19100212 A01 General requirements for all machines.

Inspection Nr: 1165746.015

Citation: 02002

Citation Type: Willful

Abatement Date: 02/15/2017 2

Initial Penalty: $126,749.00

Current Penalty: $63,375.00

Issuance Date: 01/20/2017

Nr Instances: 13

Nr Exposed: 50

Related Event Code (REC):

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0418100

Contest Date:

Final Order: 02/17/2017

Emphasis:

**Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History**
Type	Latest Event	Event Date	Penalty	Abatement Due Date	Citation Type	Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty	I: Informal Settlement	02/17/2017	$63,375.00	02/15/2017	Willful
Penalty	Z: Issued	01/20/2017	$126,749.00	02/15/2017	Willful

Text For Citation: 02 Item/Group: 002 Hazard:

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: On or about 7/26/2016 employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards where screw stackers were inadequately guarded: a. at Screw stacker #20, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate with the right door open, exposing the pusher conveyor system. b. at Screw stacker #21, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the pusher conveyor system. c. at Screw stacker #21, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door open, exposing the rotating screw. d. at Screw stacker #23, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the pusher conveyor system. e. at Screw stacker #23, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door open, exposing the rotating screw. f. at Screw stacker #24, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the pusher conveyor system. g. at Screw stacker #24, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door open, exposing the rotating screw. h. at Screw stacker #25, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the pusher conveyor system. i. at Screw stacker #25, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door open, exposing the rotating screw. j. at Screw stacker #25A, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the conveyor belts system. k. at Screw stacker #25A, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door open, exposing the rotating screw. l. at Screw stacker #41, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the right door installed, exposing the rotating screw. m. at Screw stacker #41, employees were exposed to caught in and amputation hazards where observed operating the machine with the interlock guards defeated by metallic screw caps installed over the sensors. The line continued to operate without the left door installed, exposing the conveyor belts system.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.