Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 503010501 General Duty

Inspection Nr: 307673822

Citation: 01013

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $7,000.00

Current Penalty: $10,000.00

Issuance Date: 10/11/2004

Nr Instances: 20

Nr Exposed: 42

Abatement Date: 11/18/2004

Gravity:

Report ID: 0454722

Contest Date:

Final Order: 10/09/2006

Related Event Code (REC): A

Emphasis:

Substance: 1772

Substance: 0020

Substance: 0030

Substance: 1650

Substance: 0040


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty F: Formal Settlement 10/09/2006 $10,000.00 11/18/2004 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 10/11/2004 $7,000.00 11/18/2004 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 013 Hazard: CHEMICAL

T.C.A. 50-3-105(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. An example on 4/1/04 through 7/19/04 was the suspect accuracy of the portable methyl iodide ToxiRAE monitors used by First Operators, Team Managers, and Utility Operators in plant 22. The instruments were used to define when evacuation was necessary and when respirators such as self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBAs) were required for re-entry into the containment area, during methyl iodide release and exposure situations. Calibration data for the instruments provided for the dates listed above showed that 20 of 30 (67) of the instruments had failed calibration in the "as found" state. No records were kept of how far out of calibration the instruments were, and the calibration interval (2 months) was not adjusted in consideration of the failure record. The employer recognized the toxicity of methyl iodide (MeI), as evidenced by its material safety data sheet (MSDS) on that chemical. He also recognized the need for protection against exposures to the gas, as evidenced by his "Acetic Anhydride Department Policy for MeI Personal Protective Equipment and Response to MeI Leak" and "MeI Containment System Normal Operating Procedure - Normal Operation - MeI Spill or Leak Indicated in Plant 22 Containment Area" procedures. The above-listed employees were potentially exposed to hot (242.6oF) chemical vapors and liquids from process chemicals which could be released if equipment leaked. Such a leak occurred on heat exchanger 22E-26 on 3/29/04, and it proved fatal. One of the process chemicals was methyl iodide. The hazard of inaccurate portable MeI monitors was reasonably foreseeable. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard was: a.Keeping full "as found" calibration concentration records for "benchmarking tests" ("bump tests," "accuracy tests," or "calibration as found tests") so that the level of inaccuracy of a failed test would be known; and b.Adjusting the frequency of calibration so that the accuracy of the portable monitors could be ensured. Note that the Operation and Maintenance Manual for the ToxiRAE instrument, in section 4.4, page 4-7, states: "For maximum safety, the accuracy of the ToxiRAE should be checked by exposing the sensor(s) to known concentration calibration gas before each day's use." ABATEMENT VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close