Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100333 A Selection and use of work practices
Inspection Nr: 1393269.015
Citation: 01010A
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $11,934.00
Current Penalty: $11,934.00
Issuance Date: 07/15/2019
Nr Instances: 1
Nr Exposed: 1
Abatement Date: 03/01/2020
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0522500
Contest Date: 08/05/2019
Final Order: 03/04/2020
Related Event Code (REC): C
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | J: ALJ Decision | 03/04/2020 | $11,934.00 | 03/01/2020 | Serious | |
Penalty | C: Contested | 08/21/2019 | $11,934.00 | 08/19/2019 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 07/15/2019 | $11,934.00 | 08/19/2019 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 010A Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.333(a): "General." Safety-related work practices shall be employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work is performed near or on equipment or circuits which are or may be energized.The specific safety-related work practices shall be consistent with the nature and extent of the associated electrical hazards. a. At the workplace, for employees who routinely perform work on or near energized parts (460 VAC) such as testing, troubleshooting, voltage measuring, and other tasks in and around the electrical components of the cranes, neither a flash hazard analysis was conducted to determine the proper protection required nor was a flash protection boundary established to protect employees from shock, arc flash, or arc blast. ABATEMENT NOTE: One method of abatement, among others, includes conducting a flash hazard analysis in compliance with NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace to determine the flash protection boundary and the use of electrical protective equipment as necessary for the specific related hazards of each task.