Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100119 E05 Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.
Inspection Nr: 312487457
Citation: 01007
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: W
Initial Penalty: $5,000.00
Current Penalty: $5,000.00
Issuance Date: 07/08/2009
Nr Instances: 3
Nr Exposed: 8
Abatement Date: 08/10/2009
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0317000
Contest Date: 07/28/2009
Final Order: 01/17/2012
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 01/17/2012 | $5,000.00 | 08/10/2009 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 07/08/2009 | $5,000.00 | 08/10/2009 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 007 Hazard: REFINERY
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to promptly address the teams findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution is documented; and document what actions are to be taken: a) Sunoco, Inc. Marcus Hook Refinery - The employer did not assure that Process. Hazard Analyses (PHA) recommendations were resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution was documented, as evident by the fact that two (2) PHA's were performed for the addition of the No. 3 CO Boiler, between October, 1999 and January, 2000, and findings and recommendations provided by the PHA team were not resolved, or the resolution was not documented, on or about 3/16/2009. b) Sunoco, Inc. Marcus Hook Refinery - The employer did not assure that Process Hazard Analyses (PHA) recommendations were resolved and that the resolutions was documented. A PHA was performed in 1996 for the 10 Plant FCCU, and findings and recommendations provided by the PHA team were not resolved, or the resolution was not documented. On or about 3/16/2009. c) Sunoco, Inc. Marcus Hook Refinery - The employer did not assure that Process Hazard Analyses (PHA) recommendations were resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution was documented, as evident by the fact that a PHA was performed in 2001 for the 10 Plant FCCU, and findings and recommendations provided by the PHA team were not resolved, or the resolution was not resolved in a timely manner, or the resolution was not documented, on or about 3/16/2009. NOTE: DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS CONDITION IS REQUIRED
Translate