Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19260760 D01 Fall protection.
Inspection Nr: 1716894.015
Citation: 01007
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Date: 07/12/2024 2
Initial Penalty: $11,292.00
Current Penalty: $11,292.00
Issuance Date: 06/07/2024
Nr Instances: 4
Nr Exposed: 4
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0215800
Contest Date:
Final Order: 07/03/2024
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 07/03/2024 | $11,292.00 | 07/12/2024 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 06/07/2024 | $11,292.00 | 07/12/2024 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 007 Hazard:
29 CFR 1926.760(d)(1): Guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems and their components did not conform to the criteria in �� 1926.502 (Appendix G to this subpart). a) On or about 12/15/2023, the site located at Baillie Lumber, Railroad Street, Smyrna, NY 13464: Fall arrest systems did not conform to the criteria in 1926.502(d)(8) when the horizontal lifeline used by employees was not designed, installed and used under the supervision of a qualified person as part of a personal fall arrest system. b) On or about 12/15/2023, the site located at Baillie Lumber, Railroad Street, Smyrna, NY 13464: Fall arrest systems did not conform to the criteria in 1926.502(d)(10)(i) when employees utilizing vertical lifelines were not attached to separate lifelines. c) On or about 12/15/2023, the site located at Baillie Lumber, Railroad Street, Smyrna, NY 13464: Fall arrest systems did not conform to the criteria in 1926.502(d)(15)(i) when multiple employees connected to two vertical lifelines tied around a roof vent that was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached. d) On or about 12/15/2023, the site located at Baillie Lumber, Railroad Street, Smyrna, NY 13464: Fall arrest systems did not conform to the criteria in 1926.502(d)(16)(iii) when employees were utilizing a fall arrest system which would allow for a free fall of 12 to 18 ft.