Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19101200 E01 Hazard Communication.
Inspection Nr: 849104.015
Citation: 01006
Citation Type: Other
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $6,930.00
Current Penalty: $7,000.00
Issuance Date: 07/26/2013
Nr Instances: 3
Nr Exposed: 30
Abatement Date: 08/25/2013
Gravity:
Report ID: 0626700
Contest Date: 08/15/2013
Final Order: 06/05/2014
Related Event Code (REC): A
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 06/05/2014 | $7,000.00 | 08/25/2013 | Other | |
| Penalty | C: Contested | 08/19/2013 | $6,930.00 | 08/25/2013 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 07/26/2013 | $6,930.00 | 08/25/2013 | Serious | 
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 006 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) At the facility: On January 26, 2013, and times theretofore, an employee used a cutting torch to cut used chemical drums resulting in a fatal explosion when the employer had not implemented a written hazard communication program describing how chemical information and training criteria would be met, exposing employees to a chemical flammability and explosion hazard. b) At the facility: On January 26, 2013, and times theretofore, employees were exposed to formaldehyde, a carcinogen and N-methylacetamide (manufacturer recommended exposure limit 1 ppm TWA) while cutting and using drums of Dow 890-SL sealant, when the employer had not implemented a written hazard communication program describing how chemical information and training criteria would be met, exposing employees to dermal and inhalation hazards. c) At the facility: On January 26, 2013 and times theretofore, employees used petroleum distillates (PEL 500 ppm) in 142 Solvent 66/3 in the parts washer when the employer had not implemented a written hazard communication program describing how chemical information and training criteria would be met, exposing employees to dermal and inhalation hazards.
Translate