Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 19100119 E03 III Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.

Inspection Nr: 735302.015

Citation: 01004

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: Abatement Completed

Initial Penalty: $7,000.00

Current Penalty: $4,200.00

Issuance Date: 04/26/2013

Nr Instances: 2

Nr Exposed: 19

Abatement Date: 05/10/2013

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0626600

Contest Date:

Final Order: 06/28/2013

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 06/28/2013 $4,200.00 05/10/2013 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 04/26/2013 $7,000.00 05/10/2013 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 004 Hazard:

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address the engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationship, such as, appropriate detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. (Acceptable detection methods might include process monitoring and control instrumentation with alarms, and detection hardware such as hydrocarbon sensors.) The employer does not ensure that the process hazard analysis is appropriate to the complexities of the process and does not identify evaluate, and control the hazards involved. The process hazard analysis did not include engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. The violation occurred on or about November 6, 2012 and times prior thereto, in the propane container filling and evacuation areas where the 2004 and 2011 PHAs did not address lower explosion limit detection methodologies and alarms to provide early warning of releases. This condition exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the process hazard analysis addressed the engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships, such as, appropriate detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. Acceptable detection methods might include process monitoring and control instrumentation with alarms, and detection hardware such as hydrocarbon sensors, ventilation.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close