Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 004 Hazard: REFINERY

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(ii): The process hazard analysis did not identify any previous incident which had a likely potential for catastrophic consequences in the workplace: a) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery, 10 Plant: The employer did not incorporate information from a prior incident with a likelihood for potentially catastrophic consequences into the next PHA conducted after the incident. This is evident by the fact that incident #200210834 "High 10-4 Reactor Pressure from Water Addition" occurred on 5/02/2002, and information from the incident was not incorporated into the PHA conducted in 2006, on or about 1/28/2009. b) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery, 10 Plant: The employer did not incorporate information from a prior incident with a likelihood for potentially catastrophic consequences into the next PHA conducted after the incident. This is evident by the fact that incident #200310156 Low Instrument Air Problems at 10-4" occurred on 01/18/2003, and the incident was not incorporated into the PHA conducted in 2006, on or about 1/28/2009. c) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery, 10 Plant: The employer did not incorporate information from a prior incident with a likelihood for potentially catastrophic consequences into the next PHA conducted after the incident. This is evident by the fact that incident #200311893 "10-4 Emergency Shutdown", occurred on 07/07/2003, and the incident was not incorporated into the PHA conducted in 2006, on or about 1/28/2009. d) Sunoco Marcus Hook Refinery, 10 Plant: The employer did not incorporate information from a prior incident with a likelihood for potentially catastrophic consequences into the next PHA conducted after the incident. This is evident by the fact that incident #200416378 "10-4 Bafco Power Supply Failure" occurred on 03/17/2004, and the incident was not incorporated into the PHA conducted in 2006, on or about 1/28/2009. NOTE: DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS CONDITION IS REQUIRED