Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 19100147 C04 II D The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout).

Inspection Nr: 1165746.015

Citation: 01003C

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: Abatement Completed

Initial Penalty: $0.00

Current Penalty: $0.00

Issuance Date: 01/20/2017

Nr Instances: 1

Nr Exposed: 60

Abatement Date: 02/15/2017

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0418100

Contest Date:

Final Order: 02/17/2017

Related Event Code (REC):

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 02/17/2017 $0.00 02/15/2017 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 01/20/2017 $0.00 02/15/2017 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 003C Hazard:

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control On or about 7/26/2016 throughout the facility, employees performed tasks such as but not limited to cleaning, maintenance, and troubleshooting of a variety of machines and equipment such as but not limited to Pre Expanders 1-8 and machinery along the HK Cup Lines. Written HECP (Hazardous Energy Control Program) procedures developed by the company contained deficiencies including but not limited to the following: a. Procedure identified on page 2 of the Lockout/Tagout Procedure for the HK Cup Machines did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. b. Procedure identified on page 2 of the Lockout/Tagout Procedure for the Hydraulic Pump that provides hydraulic pressure for cup machines did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. c. Procedure identified on page 2 of the Lockout/Tagout Procedure for the Printer OFF Line that prints the cups did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. d. Procedure identified on page 2 of the Lockout/Tagout Procedure for the HK Printer did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. e. Procedure identified on page 2 of the Lockout/Tagout Procedure for the Pre Expander 1 thru 8 that expands the EPS did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close