Translate
Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100217 C01 I Mechanical power presses.
Inspection Nr: 1793548.015
Citation: 01003
Citation Type: Other
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $14,895.00
Current Penalty: $8,000.00
Issuance Date: 02/27/2025
Nr Instances: 4
Nr Exposed: 12
Abatement Date: 03/19/2025
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0522300
Contest Date:
Final Order: 03/25/2025
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 03/25/2025 | $8,000.00 | 03/19/2025 | Other | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 02/27/2025 | $14,895.00 | 03/19/2025 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 003 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i):The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): a) On or about December 12, 2025 the employer did not ensure that effective guarding was in place on the #106 Seyi mechanical power press. Employees operated the press using foot pedal actuation methods at which time the light curtains and barrier guarding did not prevent the employee from reaching the point of operation. Openings in the guarding did not meet the specifications of table O-10 of the standards. b) On or about December 12, 2025 the employer did not ensure that effective guarding was in place on the #107 Seyi mechanical power press. Employees operated the press using foot pedal actuation methods at which time the light curtains and barrier guarding did not prevent the employee from reaching the point of operation. Openings in the guarding did not meet the specifications of table O-10 of the standards. c) On or about December 10, 2025 the employer did not ensure that effective guarding was in place on the #51 Komatsu mechanical power press. Employees operated the press using foot pedal actuation methods at which time the light curtains and barrier guarding did not prevent the employee from reaching the point of operation. Openings in the guarding did not meet the specifications of table O-10 of the standards.