Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100212 A03 II General requirements for all machines.
Inspection Nr: 1307915.015
Citation: 01003
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $9,054.00
Current Penalty: $4,527.00
Issuance Date: 05/16/2018
Nr Instances: 8
Nr Exposed: 25
Abatement Date: 10/19/2018
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0521100
Contest Date:
Final Order: 05/29/2018
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | P: Petition to Mod Abatement | $4,527.00 | 10/19/2018 | Serious | ||
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 05/29/2018 | $4,527.00 | 09/28/2018 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 05/16/2018 | $9,054.00 | 06/22/2018 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 003 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle: a) On or about April 11, 2018 the AFM Fabtek hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous downward motion of the ram during the bending process. b) On or about April 11, 2018 the Mitsubishi Toyoxoxi hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous downward motion of the ram during the bending process. c) On or about April 11, 2018 the Amada RG-80 hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous upward motion of the ram during the bending process. d) On or about April 11, 2018 the Amada RG-50 hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous upward motion of the ram during the bending process. e) On or about April 11, 2018 the Amada RG-35S hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous upward motion of the ram during the bending process. f) On or about April 11, 2018 the Amada RG-50 hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous upward motion of the ram during the bending process. g) On or about April 11, 2018 the Amada Diamond BB 4013 hydraulic brake press point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous upward motion of the ram during the bending process. h) On or about January 11, 2018 the Haeger Pemsert point-of-operation was not guarded to prevent employee exposure to the hazardous force exerted when the upper and lower tool holders made contact and/or a conductive path was created by contact with a conductive surface.
Translate