Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100119 E03 V Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.
Inspection Nr: 899109.015
Citation: 01002B
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $0.00
Current Penalty: $0.00
Issuance Date: 08/28/2013
Nr Instances: 1
Nr Exposed: 12
Abatement Date: 09/19/2013
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0636900
Contest Date:
Final Order: 09/13/2013
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 09/13/2013 | $0.00 | 09/19/2013 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 08/28/2013 | $0.00 | 09/19/2013 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002B Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address facility siting. The employer does not ensure the process hazard analysis addressed facility siting. The violation occurred in the Worsham Steed Storage and Gas Plant on or about April 4, 2013 and times prior to where the employer failed to ensure the 2006 initial process hazards analysis of the Amine and CRYO Units and the 2010 initial process hazards analysis of the Gas Storage Unit addressed the siting of the control room and maintenance facilities within gas plant. This condition exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the process hazard analysis addressed facility siting.
Translate