Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100147 C04 II D The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout).
Inspection Nr: 1627606.015
Citation: 01002B
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Abatement Completed
Initial Penalty: $0.00
Current Penalty: $0.00
Issuance Date: 02/22/2023
Nr Instances: 4
Nr Exposed: 2
Abatement Date: 03/27/2023
Gravity: 5
Report ID: 0936300
Contest Date: 03/20/2023
Final Order: 01/15/2024
Related Event Code (REC):
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | F: Formal Settlement | 01/15/2024 | $0.00 | 03/27/2023 | Serious | |
Penalty | C: Contested | 03/22/2023 | $0.00 | 03/27/2023 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 02/22/2023 | $0.00 | 03/27/2023 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002B Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control a. Production Floor: The labeler was serviced weekly without specific requirements for testing the effectiveness of tagout devices. Employees were exposed to caught-in, struck by, and crushing hazards. b. Production Floor: The blow mold was serviced weekly without specific requirements for testing the effectiveness of tagout devices. Employees were exposed to caught-in, struck by, and crushing hazards. c. Production Floor: The palletizer was serviced weekly without specific requirements testing the effectiveness of tagout devices. Employees were exposed to caught-in, struck by, and crushing hazards. d. Production Floor: The packer was serviced weekly without specific requirements for testing the effectiveness of tagout devices. Employees were exposed to caught-in, struck by, and crushing hazards.