Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 5A0001 OSH Act General Duty Paragraph

Inspection Nr: 310895214

Citation: 01002

Citation Type: Serious

Abatement Status: X

Initial Penalty: $2,500.00

Current Penalty: $1,250.00

Issuance Date: 09/13/2007

Nr Instances: 2

Nr Exposed: 6

Abatement Date: 10/16/2007

Gravity: 03

Report ID: 0626600

Contest Date:

Final Order:

Related Event Code (REC): C

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty I: Informal Settlement 10/03/2007 $1,250.00 10/16/2007 Serious  
Penalty Z: Issued 09/13/2007 $2,500.00 10/16/2007 Serious  

Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard: FALLING

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of falling and injuries associated with swing falls. a)On or about April 4, 2007, and at times theretofore and thereafter, Cells B and C, employees were exposed to fall hazards and injuries from swing falls because the employer did not insure that the welding booms used as fall protection anchorage connectors were strong enough to support at least 5000 pounds. Bolted connections on welding boom bases were missing, and boom locks were damaged. b)On or about April 4, 2007, Horizontal lifelines used in Cells C and H were not evaluated in accordance with acceptable engineering practices to determine that the system would perform as intended, did not undergo qualification testing, and no calculations performed and certified by a qualified person could be provided. The wire rope clips used in the installation of the lifelines were malleable clips, not forged, and had no proof test. Two of three clips were installed backwards on the lifeline at Cell C. One formed eye at the horizontal lifeline at Cell C was formed without use of a thimble. One end of the wire rope was not seized, whipped or spliced and was unraveling. One acceptable method of abatement, among others, is to evaluate fall protection systems in accordance with ANSI Z359.1-1992 Section 3. Requirements, Section 4.Qualification Testing, Section 5. Marking and Instructions, Section 6. Inspection, Maintenance and Storage of Equipment, and Section 7. Equipment, Selection, Rigging, Use and Training. Disclaimers: 1.You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2.The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3.The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement. *** Certification and Documentation of Abatement Required ***

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close