Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19260501 B02 I Duty to have fall protection.
Inspection Nr: 1562978.015
Citation: 01002
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Date: 05/26/2022 2
Initial Penalty: $4,351.00
Current Penalty: $2,828.15
Issuance Date: 05/02/2022
Nr Instances: 3
Nr Exposed: 7
Related Event Code (REC):
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0419700
Contest Date:
Final Order: 05/24/2022
Emphasis:
Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 05/24/2022 | $2,828.15 | 05/26/2022 | Serious | |
Penalty | Z: Issued | 05/02/2022 | $4,351.00 | 05/26/2022 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard:
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Note: If the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502 should have been developed and implemented. a. On or about November 4, 2021, at the new commercial construction site in Orange City, Florida: during truss erection, the crew standing and/or sitting on roof truss components, such as but not limited to web members and bottom chord of the trusses were not protected from a 21 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. b. On or about November 8, 2021, and at times prior, at the new commercial construction site in Orange City, Florida: during framing work, the crew standing on the top wall were not protected from a 12 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. c. On or about November 8, 2021, at the new commercial construction site in Orange City, Florida: on the roof, the crew installing sheathing was not protected from a 12 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.