Translate
Violation Detail
Standard Cited: 19100212 A01 General requirements for all machines.
Inspection Nr: 1109626.015
Citation: 01002
Citation Type: Serious
Abatement Status: Not Completed - Employer Out of Business
Initial Penalty: $7,000.00
Current Penalty: $7,000.00
Issuance Date: 02/23/2016
Nr Instances: 7
Nr Exposed: 14
Abatement Date: 03/11/2016
Gravity: 10
Report ID: 0626600
Contest Date:
Final Order: 03/24/2016
Related Event Code (REC): C
Emphasis:
| Failure to Abate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity Nr | Issuance | Penalty | Contest | Final Order | |||
| 1171293 | 01/19/2017 | $132,816.15 | 02/10/2017 | ||||
| Type | Latest Event | Event Date | Penalty | Abatement Due Date | Citation Type | Failure to Abate Inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTA | Z: Issued | 01/19/2017 | $132,816.15 | 01/31/2017 | 1171293.015 | |
| Penalty | I: Informal Settlement | 03/24/2016 | $7,000.00 | 03/11/2016 | Serious | |
| Penalty | Z: Issued | 02/23/2016 | $7,000.00 | 03/11/2016 | Serious |
Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 002 Hazard:
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Press Well notching machine, Model NM80, ID# 1, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. b. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Press Well notching machine, Model NM80, ID# 2, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. c. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Press Well notching machine, Model NM80, ID# 3, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. d. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Press Well notching machine, ID# NOT3, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. e. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Ficep Ironworker punch, Model TACO 1050 PLC/SP 100, S/N 33544-Punch 3/C, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. f. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Ficep Ironworker punch, Model TACO 1050 PLC/SP 100, S/N 33546-Punch 2/B, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. g. On or about December 3, 2015, and times prior thereto, employees in the fabrication area were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Ficep Ironworker punch, Model TACO 1050 PLC/SP 100, S/N 33547-Punch 1/A, without one or more methods of machine guarding to protect the operator from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.